scholarly journals Dynamic analysis of lower leg muscles response to whole body vibration stimulation at different frequencies and postures: implications for training

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isotta Rigoni ◽  
Tecla Bonci ◽  
Paolo Bifulco ◽  
Antonio Fratini

AbstractPurposeTo characterise the mechanical and neuromuscular response of lower limb muscles in subjects undergoing Whole Body Vibration (WBV) at different frequencies while holding two static postures.MethodsTwenty-five participants underwent WBV at 15, 20, 25 and 30 Hz while holding a static ‘hack squat’ and on ‘fore feet’ posture. Surface electromyography (sEMG) and soft tissue accelerations were collected from Gastrocnemius Lateralis (GL), Soleus (SOL) and Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscles.ResultsOnly specific WBV settings led to a significant increase in muscle contraction. Specifically, the WBV-induced activation of SOL and GL was maximal in fore-feet and in response to higher frequencies. Estimated displacement at muscle bellies revealed a resonant pattern never highlighted before. After stimulation starts, muscle oscillation reaches a peak followed by a drop and a further stabilisation (few seconds after the peak) that suggests the occurrence of a neuromuscular activation to reduce the vibration-induced oscillation.ConclusionLower leg muscles need a response time to tune to a vibratory stimulation, which discourages the use of dynamic exercises on vibrating platforms. To maximize calf muscle response to WBVs, a stimulation frequency in the range of 25-30 Hz and an ‘on fore feet’ posture are recommended.

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 103-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaofei Zhang ◽  
Xiangjie Meng ◽  
Dennis E. Anderson ◽  
Wenjun Wang ◽  
Xin Tao ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 522-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flaminia Carlucci ◽  
Giorgio Orlando ◽  
Jonida Haxhi ◽  
Luca Laudani ◽  
Arrigo Giombini ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hassam A. Baig ◽  
Daniel B. Dorman ◽  
Bethany L. Shivers ◽  
Arlene Breaux-Waltz ◽  
V. Carol Chancey ◽  
...  

Vibration exposure has been linked to chronic neck and lower back pain [1,2]. For example, American male workers operating vibrating vehicles, such as industrial trucks and tractors, have been reported to have a higher prevalence of low back pain than workers whose occupations do not involve vibration exposures [1]. Also, military helicopter aviators report increased pain during deployment compared to pre-deployment, with between 22–37% reporting neck and 39–70% reporting low back pain [2]. It has been suggested that the cyclic muscle response to whole body vibration (WBV) can lead to muscle fatigue, further contributing to the development of low back pain [3]. Although several studies have measured the transmissibility response of the human spine [4,5], studies defining the mechanical effects of whole body vibration in a seated human are limited [4,5] and none have investigated the relationship between the biomechanical and muscle activity responses during such whole body vibration exposures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 642-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anelise Sonza ◽  
Nina Völkel ◽  
Milton A. Zaro ◽  
Matilde Achaval ◽  
Ewald M. Hennig

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 618-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annelies Van Erck ◽  
Luc Vanden Bossche ◽  
Erik Witvrouw ◽  
Vicky Van der Kelen ◽  
Iris Wojtowicz ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 232-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro J Marín ◽  
Azael J Herrero ◽  
David García-López ◽  
Matthew R Rhea ◽  
José López-Chicharro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document