scholarly journals Efficacy of vasopressin, steroid, and epinephrine protocol for in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis

Author(s):  
Danish Iltaf Satti ◽  
Yan Hiu Athena Lee ◽  
Keith Sai Kit Leung ◽  
Jeremy Man Ho Hui ◽  
Thompson Ka Ming Kot ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess the effect of vasopressin, steroid and epinephrine (VSE) combination therapy on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and test the conclusiveness of evidence using trial sequential analysis (TSA). Methods: The systematic search included PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomized controlled trials that included adult patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest, with at least one group receiving combined vasopressin, epinephrine and steroid therapy were selected. Data was extracted independently by two reviewers. The main outcome of interest was ROSC. Other outcomes included survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcomes and survival to 30 and 90 days with good neurological outcomes. Results: We included a total of three randomized controlled trials (n=869 patients). Results showed that Vasopressin, steroid and epinephrine combination therapy increased return of spontaneous circulation (risk ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.47) as compared to placebo. Trial sequential analysis demonstrated that the existing evidence is conclusive. This was also validated by the alpha-spending adjusted relative risk (1.32 [1.16, 1.49], p<0.0001). Other outcomes could not be meta-analysed due to differences in timeframe in the included studies. Conclusions: VSE combination therapy administered in cardiopulmonary resuscitation led to improved rates of return of spontaneous circulation. Future trials of vasopressin, steroid and epinephrine combination therapy should evaluate survival to hospital discharge, neurological function and long-term survival. Keywords: cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; meta-analysis; vasopressin; steroid; epinephrine

Hernia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Aiolfi ◽  
Marta Cavalli ◽  
Simona Del Ferraro ◽  
Livia Manfredini ◽  
Francesca Lombardo ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To examine the updated evidence on safety, effectiveness, and outcomes of the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) versus the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and to explore the timely tendency variations favoring one treatment over another. Methods Systematic review and trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were consulted. Risk Ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. Results Fifteen RCTs were included (1359 patients). Of these, 702 (51.6%) underwent TAPP and 657 (48.4%) TEP repair. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 92 years and 87.9% were males. The estimated pooled RR for hernia recurrence (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.35–1.96) and chronic pain (RR = 1.51; 95% CI 0.54–4.22) were similar for TEP vs. TAPP. The TSA shows a cumulative z-curve without crossing the monitoring boundaries line (Z = 1.96), thus supporting true negative results while the information size was calculated as adequate for both outcomes. No significant differences were found in term of early postoperative pain, operative time, wound-related complications, hospital length of stay, return to work/daily activities, and costs. Conclusions TEP and TAPP repair seems comparable in terms of postoperative hernia recurrence and chronic pain. The cumulative evidence and information size are sufficient to provide a conclusive evidence on recurrence and chronic pain. Similar trials or meta-analyses seem unlikely to show diverse results and should be discouraged.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document