scholarly journals Macaque-human differences in SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibody response elicited by vaccination or infection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra C. Willcox ◽  
Kevin Sung ◽  
Meghan E. Garrett ◽  
Jared G. Galloway ◽  
Megan A. O’Connor ◽  
...  

AbstractMacaques are a commonly used model for studying immunity to human viruses, including for studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. However, it is unknown whether macaque antibody responses recapitulate, and thus appropriately model, the response in humans. To answer this question, we employed a phage-based deep mutational scanning approach (Phage- DMS) to compare which linear epitopes are targeted on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein in humans and macaques following either vaccination or infection. We also used Phage-DMS to determine antibody escape pathways within each epitope, enabling a granular comparison of antibody binding specificities at the locus level. Overall, we identified some common epitope targets in both macaques and humans, including in the fusion peptide (FP) and stem helix- heptad repeat 2 (SH-H) regions. Differences between groups included a response to epitopes in the N-terminal domain (NTD) and C-terminal domain (CTD) in vaccinated humans but not vaccinated macaques, as well as recognition of a CTD epitope and epitopes flanking the FP in convalescent macaques but not convalescent humans. There was also considerable variability in the escape pathways among individuals within each group. Sera from convalescent macaques showed the least variability in escape overall and converged on a common response with vaccinated humans in the SH-H epitope region, suggesting highly similar antibodies were elicited. Collectively, these findings suggest that the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in macaques shares many features with humans, but with substantial differences in the recognition of certain epitopes and considerable individual variability in antibody escape profiles, suggesting a diverse repertoire of antibodies that can respond to major epitopes in both humans and macaques.Author summaryNon-human primates, including macaques, are considered the best animal model for studying infectious diseases that infect humans. Vaccine candidates for SARS-CoV-2 are first tested in macaques to assess immune responses prior to advancing to human trials, and macaques are also used to model the human immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, there may be differences in how macaque and human antibodies recognize the SARS-CoV-2 entry protein, Spike. Here we characterized the locations on Spike that are recognized by antibodies from vaccinated or infected macaques and humans. We also made mutations to the viral sequence and assessed how these affected antibody binding, enabling a comparison of antibody binding requirements between macaques and humans at a very precise level. We found that macaques and humans share some responses, but also recognize distinct regions of Spike. We also found that in general, antibodies from different individuals had unique responses to viral mutations, regardless of species. These results will yield a better understanding of how macaque data can be used to inform human immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e0009378
Author(s):  
Ines Lakhal-Naouar ◽  
Rami Mukbel ◽  
Robert F. DeFraites ◽  
Rupal M. Mody ◽  
Lina N. Massoud ◽  
...  

Background Sand fly saliva exposure plays an important role in immunity against leishmaniasis where it has mostly been associated with protection. Phlebotomus (Ph.) alexandri transmits Leishmania (L.) infantum, the causative agent of visceral leishmaniasis (VL), in Iraq. Our group recently demonstrated that 20% of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) deployers had asymptomatic VL (AVL) indicative of prior infection by the parasite L. infantum. Little is known about Ph. alexandri saliva, and the human immune response to it has never been investigated. Here, we characterize the humoral and cellular immune response to vector saliva in OIF deployers naturally exposed to bites of Ph. alexandri and characterize their immunological profiles in association to AVL. Methodology/Principal findings The humoral response to Ph. alexandri salivary gland homogenate (SGH) showed that 64% of 200 OIF deployers developed an antibody response. To assess the cellular immune response to saliva, we selected a subcohort of subjects based on their post-travel (median 4 months; range 1–22 months) antibody response (SGH Antibody [Ab] positive or negative) as well as their AVL status; ten never-traveled controls were also included. Banked peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), collected ~10 years after end of deployment, were stimulated with SGH for 96 hours. The levels of IFN- γ, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13 and IL-17 were determined by ELISA. Our findings indicate that OIF deployers mounted a cellular response to SGH where the anti-SGH+ asymptomatic subjects developed the highest cytokine levels. Further, stimulation with SGH produced a mixture of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed no correlation between the cellular immune response to Ph. alexandri SGH and prevention from asymptomatic infection with L. infantum. Conclusions/Significance As we found, although all infected deployers demonstrated persistent disease control years after deployment, this did not correlate with anti-saliva systemic cellular response. More exposure to this vector may facilitate transmission of the L. infantum parasite. Since exposure to saliva of Ph. alexandri may alter the human immune response to bites of this vector, this parameter should be taken into consideration when considering the VL risk.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 571-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Burioni ◽  
Eric J. Topol

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Williamson

This review considers the steps required to evaluate a candidate biodefense vaccine or therapy as it emerges from the research phase, in order to transition it to development. The options for preclinical modelling of efficacy are considered in the context of the FDA’s Animal Rule.


1989 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 386???392 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEONARD H. CALABRESE ◽  
SUSAN M. KLEINER ◽  
BARBARA P. BARNA ◽  
CHRISTINE I. SKIBINSKI ◽  
DONALD T. KIRKENDALL ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Fenner ◽  
David I Rosen ◽  
Anthony A Ferrante ◽  
Amy E Stevens ◽  
Chad E Bigelow ◽  
...  

AbstractDevelopment of field portable apparatus and methods for cytokine assay of human saliva by fluorescent-reporting microarray plates is described. Multiplexed assay of 12 cytokines for minimally-processed saliva is read with a CCD-based imager under LED excitation. Immune responsive cytokines are measured at levels significant for indication of human disease state. The motivational context for the new apparatus development, the general optical design issues, saliva protocol, and image analysis are described.


Hybridoma ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
WENDY A. HUTCHINS ◽  
THOMAS KIEBER-EMMONS ◽  
GEORGE M. CARLONE ◽  
M.A. JULIE WESTERINK

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document