scholarly journals Supersolid phase of the extended Bose-Hubbard model with an artificial gauge field

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Suthar ◽  
Hrushikesh Sable ◽  
Rukmani Bai ◽  
Soumik Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Sukla Pal ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (01) ◽  
pp. 159-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
MANORANJAN KUMAR ◽  
SUJIT SARKAR ◽  
S. RAMASESHA

We use the Density Matrix Renormalization Group and the Abelian bosonization method to study the effect of density on quantum phases of one-dimensional extended Bose–Hubbard model. We predict the existence of supersolid phase and also other quantum phases for this system. We have analyzed the role of extended range interaction parameters on solitonic phase near half-filling. We discuss the effects of dimerization in nearest neighbor hopping and interaction as well as next nearest neighbor interaction on the plateau phase at half-filling.


1988 ◽  
Vol 02 (05) ◽  
pp. 613-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuo Matsui

I construct a collective field theory for Hubbard model of high Tc superconductivity, using a path-integral method in the third quantized (slave boson) form. It is a U(1) gauge invariant theory consisting of a U(1) gauge field and a Higgs scalar. The gauge field stands for resonating valence bonds and describes a (short range) antiferro-paramagnet phase transition by a condensation machanism. The Higgs scalar represents spinless holes carrying electric charges. Through the confining gauge force, there formed bounded hole pairs on each link, which correspond to the vector mesons in lattice QCD. A superconducting phase is to be described by a condensation of a gauge invariant order parameter for these hole pairs, and to be compared with the color confining chirally broken phase in QCD. A Ginzburg-Landau theory for the vector hole-pair field is proposed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (19) ◽  
pp. 193701-193701
Author(s):  
Zhou Xiao-Fan ◽  
◽  
Fan Jing-Tao ◽  
Chen Gang ◽  
Jia Suo-Tang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Calamari

In recent years, the ideas of the mathematician Bernhard Riemann (1826–66) have come to the fore as one of Deleuze's principal sources of inspiration in regard to his engagements with mathematics, and the history of mathematics. Nevertheless, some relevant aspects and implications of Deleuze's philosophical reception and appropriation of Riemann's thought remain unexplored. In the first part of the paper I will begin by reconsidering the first explicit mention of Riemann in Deleuze's work, namely, in the second chapter of Bergsonism (1966). In this context, as I intend to show first, Deleuze's synthesis of some key features of the Riemannian theory of multiplicities (manifolds) is entirely dependent, both textually and conceptually, on his reading of another prominent figure in the history of mathematics: Hermann Weyl (1885–1955). This aspect has been largely underestimated, if not entirely neglected. However, as I attempt to bring out in the second part of the paper, reframing the understanding of Deleuze's philosophical engagement with Riemann's mathematics through the Riemann–Weyl conjunction can allow us to disclose some unexplored aspects of Deleuze's further elaboration of his theory of multiplicities (rhizomatic multiplicities, smooth spaces) and profound confrontation with contemporary science (fibre bundle topology and gauge field theory). This finally permits delineation of a correlation between Deleuze's plane of immanence and the contemporary physico-mathematical space of fundamental interactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document