scholarly journals Dynamical mass generation in three-dimensional supersymmetric U(1) gauge field theory

1999 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Campbell-Smith ◽  
N. E. Mavromatos
1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 1569-1578
Author(s):  
DAE-YUP SONG

The large-N nonlinear O(N) sigma model with the curvature coupled term ξRn2 is examined on a spacetime of R1×S2 topology (three-dimensional static Einstein universe). Making use of the cutoff method, we find the renormalized effective potential which shows that, for ξ>1/8, there is a second-order phase transition. Above the critical curvature, the dynamical mass generation does not take place even in the strong-coupled regime. The phase structure of the model on S2 is also discussed.


1992 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. 1007-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
KAORU AMANO ◽  
HIROSHI SHIROKURA

We quantize the three-dimensional O(2) pure Chern–Simons gauge field theory in a functional coherent-state representation. Both trivial and nontrivial flat O(2) bundles admit physical states. An explicit calculation relates the state functionals to the rational Z2-orbifold models.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (29) ◽  
pp. 2201-2208 ◽  
Author(s):  
YISHI DUAN ◽  
XINHUI ZHANG ◽  
LI ZHAO

Based on the decomposition of U(1) gauge potential theory and the ϕ-mapping topological current theory, the three-dimensional knot invariant and a four-dimensional new topological invariant are discussed in the U(1) gauge field.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Calamari

In recent years, the ideas of the mathematician Bernhard Riemann (1826–66) have come to the fore as one of Deleuze's principal sources of inspiration in regard to his engagements with mathematics, and the history of mathematics. Nevertheless, some relevant aspects and implications of Deleuze's philosophical reception and appropriation of Riemann's thought remain unexplored. In the first part of the paper I will begin by reconsidering the first explicit mention of Riemann in Deleuze's work, namely, in the second chapter of Bergsonism (1966). In this context, as I intend to show first, Deleuze's synthesis of some key features of the Riemannian theory of multiplicities (manifolds) is entirely dependent, both textually and conceptually, on his reading of another prominent figure in the history of mathematics: Hermann Weyl (1885–1955). This aspect has been largely underestimated, if not entirely neglected. However, as I attempt to bring out in the second part of the paper, reframing the understanding of Deleuze's philosophical engagement with Riemann's mathematics through the Riemann–Weyl conjunction can allow us to disclose some unexplored aspects of Deleuze's further elaboration of his theory of multiplicities (rhizomatic multiplicities, smooth spaces) and profound confrontation with contemporary science (fibre bundle topology and gauge field theory). This finally permits delineation of a correlation between Deleuze's plane of immanence and the contemporary physico-mathematical space of fundamental interactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document