scholarly journals Connecting Majorana phases to the geometric parameters of the Majorana unitarity triangle in a neutrino mass matrix model

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Surender Verma ◽  
Shankita Bhardwaj
2001 ◽  
Vol T93 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger Bech Nielsen ◽  
Yasutake Takanishi

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (18n19) ◽  
pp. 3661-3673 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOSHIO KOIDE ◽  
HIROYUKI NISHIURA

Based on a neutrino mass matrix model in which a 2 ↔ 3 symmetry is only broken by a phase parameter, it is investigated how the lepton mixing matrix can deviate from the so-called tribimaximal mixing under a condition that CP is maximally violated.


2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 (01) ◽  
pp. 042-042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mizue Honda ◽  
Ryo Takahashi ◽  
Morimitsu Tanimoto

2011 ◽  
Vol 702 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dev ◽  
Shivani Gupta ◽  
Radha Raman Gautam

2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. I. Lashin ◽  
M. Abbas ◽  
N. Chamoun ◽  
S. Nasri

2015 ◽  
Vol 740 ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivani Gupta ◽  
C.S. Kim ◽  
Pankaj Sharma

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (36) ◽  
pp. 2767-2774 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERNEST MA

If a family symmetry exists for the quarks and leptons, the Higgs sector is expected to be enlarged to be able to support the transformation properties of this symmetry. There are, however, three possible generic ways (at tree level) of hiding this symmetry in the context of the Standard Model with just one Higgs doublet. All three mechanisms have their natural realizations in the unification symmetry E6 and one in SO (10). An interesting example based on SO (10)×A4 for the neutrino mass matrix is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document