scholarly journals Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of N-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-cyclopropyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamide

Author(s):  
Nazariy Pokhodylo ◽  
Yurii Slyvka ◽  
Volodymyr Pavlyuk

The title compound, C19H17ClN4O2, was obtained via a two-step synthesis involving the enol-mediated click Dimroth reaction of 4-azidoanisole with methyl 3-cyclopropyl-3-oxopropanoate leading to the 5-cyclopropyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylic acid and subsequent acid amidation with 4-chloroaniline by 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI). It crystallizes in space group P21/n, with one molecule in the asymmetric unit. In the extended structure, two molecules arranged in a near coplanar fashion relative to the triazole ring planes are interconnected by N—H...N and C—H...N hydrogen bonds into a homodimer. The formation of dimers is a consequence of the above interaction and the edge-to-face stacking of aromatic rings, which are turned by 58.0 (3)° relative to each other. The dimers are linked by C—H...O interactions into ribbons. DFT calculations demonstrate that the frontier molecular orbitals are well separated in energy and the HOMO is largely localized on the 4-chlorophenyl amide motif while the LUMO is associated with aryltriazole grouping. A Hirshfeld surface analysis was performed to further analyse the intermolecular interactions.

Author(s):  
H. Purandara ◽  
S. Foro ◽  
B. Thimme Gowda

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C15H13ClN4O5S·C3H7NO, contains one molecule each of the Schiff base and the solvent dimethylformamide. The hydrazone group adopts anEconfiguration about the C=N bond. The dihedral angle between the two aromatic rings is 86.58 (2)°. In the crystal, pairs of N—H...O hydrogen bonds between centrosymmetrically related molecules generates rings with anR22(10) graph-set motif. The dimers are further linkedviaN—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation ofR33(11) ring motifs. C—H...π interactions are also observed. The intermolecular interactions in the crystal structure were quantified and analysed using Hirshfeld surface analysis, which indicates that the most significant contacts in packing are O...H/H...O (31.3%), followed by H...H (25.4%) and C...H/H...C (13.0%).


Author(s):  
Nasiba Pirnazarova ◽  
Ubaydullo Yakubov ◽  
Sevara Allabergenova ◽  
Akmaljon Tojiboev ◽  
Kambarali Turgunov ◽  
...  

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C16H13N3OS, comprises two molecules (A and B) with similar conformations that differ mainly in the orientation of the phenyl group relative to the rest of the molecule, as expressed by the Cthioamide—Nthioamide—Cphenyl—Cphenyl torsion angle of 49.3 (3)° for molecule A and of 5.4 (3)° for molecule B. In the crystal, two intermolecular N—H...N hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of a dimer with R 2 2(10) graph-set notation. A Hirshfeld surface analysis revealed that H...H interactions are the most important intermolecular interactions, contributing 40.9% to the Hirshfeld surface.


Author(s):  
Dmitriy F. Mertsalov ◽  
Kseniia A. Alekseeva ◽  
Magrycheva S. Daria ◽  
Maxim E. Cheshigin ◽  
Sevim Türktekin Çelikesir ◽  
...  

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C15H12Br2F3NO2, consists of two crystallographically independent molecules. In both molecules, the pyrrolidine and tetrahydrofuran rings adopt an envelope conformation. In the crystal, molecule pairs generate centrosymmetric rings with R 2 2(8) motifs linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds. These pairs of molecules form a tetrameric supramolecular motif, leading to molecular layers parallel to the (100) plane by C—H...π and C—Br...π interactions. Interlayer van der Waals and interhalogen interactions stabilize molecular packing. The F atoms of the CF3 groups of both molecules are disordered over two sets of sites with refined site occupancies of 0.60 (3)/0.40 (3) and 0.640 (15)/0.360 (15). The most important contributions to the surface contacts of both molecules are from H...H (23.8 and 22.4%), Br...H/H...Br (18.3 and 12.3%), O...H/H...O (14.3 and 9.7%) and F...H/H...F (10.4 and 19.1%) interactions, as concluded from a Hirshfeld surface analysis.


Author(s):  
Hassiba Bougueria ◽  
Souheyla Chetioui ◽  
Mohammed Abdellatif Bensegueni ◽  
Jean-Pierre Djukic ◽  
Nesrine Benarous

The title compound, C16H11ClN2O2, was obtained by diazotization of 2-amino-4-chlorophenol followed by a coupling reaction with β-naphthol. There are two molecules (A and B) in the asymmetric unit. The crystal structure features only one type of intermolecular interaction, that is strong hydrogen bonds involving the hydroxyl group. The naphthol and phenol fragments attached to the C=N—N— moiety exhibit an s-trans conformation. In addition, those fragments are almost coplanar, subtending a dihedral angle of 13.11 (2)° in molecule A and 10.35 (2)° in molecule B. A Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates that the most important contributions to the crystal packing are from H...H (32.1%), C...H/H...C (23.1%), Cl...H/H...Cl (15.2%), O...H/H...O (12.8%) and C...C (9%) contacts.


Author(s):  
Yassine El Ghallab ◽  
Sanae Derfoufi ◽  
El Mostafa Ketatni ◽  
Mohamed Saadi ◽  
Lahcen El Ammari

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C10H11NO4, which was synthesized via nitration reaction of eugenol (4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol) with a mixture of nitric acid and sulfuric acid, consists of three independent molecules of similar geometry. Each molecule displays an intramolecular hydrogen bond involving the hydroxide and the nitro group forming an S(6) motif. The crystal cohesion is ensured by intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds in addition to π–π stacking interactions between the aromatic rings [centroid–centroid distances = 3.6583 (17)–4.0624 (16) Å]. The Hirshfeld surface analysis and the two-dimensional fingerprint plots show that H...H (39.6%), O...H/H...O (37.7%), C...H/H...C (12.5%) and C...C (4%) are the most important contributors towards the crystal packing.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1063-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. Sheshadri ◽  
Zeliha Atioğlu ◽  
Mehmet Akkurt ◽  
M. K. Veeraiah ◽  
Ching Kheng Quah ◽  
...  

In the molecule of the title compound, C17H14BrFO3, the aromatic rings are tilted with respect to the enone bridge by 13.63 (14) and 4.27 (15)°, and form a dihedral angle 17.91 (17)°. In the crystal, centrosymmetrically related molecules are linked by pairs of C—H...O hydrogen bonds into dimeric units, forming rings of R 2 2(14) graph-set motif. The dimers are further connected by weak C—H...O hydrogen interactions, forming layers parallel to (10\overline{1}). Hirshfeld surface analysis shows that van der Waals interactions constitute the major contribution to the intermolecular interactions, with H...H contacts accounting for 29.7% of the surface.


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1043-1047
Author(s):  
Nazariy T. Pokhodylo ◽  
Yurii Slyvka ◽  
Volodymyr Pavlyuk

The title compound, C15H18N4O2, was obtained via a two-step synthesis (Dimroth reaction and amidation) for anticancer activity screening and was selected from a 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamide library. The cyclopropyl ring is oriented almost perpendicular to the benzene ring [dihedral angle = 87.9 (1)°], while the dihedral angle between the mean plane of the cyclopropyl ring and that of the triazole ring is 55.6 (1)°. In the crystal, the molecules are linked by O—H...O and C—H...N interactions into infinite ribbons propagating in the [001] direction, which are interconnected by weak C—H...O interactions into layers. The intermolecular interactions were characterized via Hirshfeld surface analysis, which indicated that the largest fingerprint contact percentages are H...H (55.5%), N...H/H...N (15.4%), C...H/H...C (13.2%) and O...H/H...O (12.9%).


Author(s):  
Kadriye Özkaraca ◽  
Mehmet Akkurt ◽  
Namiq Q. Shikhaliyev ◽  
Ulviyya F. Askerova ◽  
Gulnar T. Suleymanova ◽  
...  

In the title compound, C16H14Cl2FN3, the dihedral angle between the two aromatic rings is 64.12 (14)°. The crystal structure is stabilized by a short Cl...H contact, C—Cl...π and van der Waals interactions. The Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint plots show that H...H (33.3%), Cl...H/H...Cl (22.9%) and C...H/H...C (15.5%) interactions are the most important contributors towards the crystal packing.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 1857-1861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Ben-Yahia ◽  
Youness El Bakri ◽  
Chin-Hung Lai ◽  
El Mokhtar Essassi ◽  
Joel T. Mague

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C14H11N3O3, consists of two independent molecules having very similar conformations in which the indazole moieties are planar. The independent molecules are distinguished by small differences in the rotational orientations of the nitro groups. In the crystal, N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds form zigzag chains along the b-axis direction. Additional C—H...O hydrogen bonds link the chains into layers parallel to (10\overline{1}). These are connected by slipped π-stacking and C—H...π(ring) interactions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 1815-1820
Author(s):  
Nadeem Abad ◽  
Youssef Ramli ◽  
Tuncer Hökelek ◽  
Nada Kheira Sebbar ◽  
Joel T. Mague ◽  
...  

The title compound, C16H19N5O, is built up from a planar quinoxalinone ring system linked through a methylene bridge to a 1,2,3-triazole ring, which in turn carries ann-butyl substituent. The triazole ring is inclined by 67.09 (4)° to the quinoxalinone ring plane. In the crystal, the molecules form oblique stacks along thea-axis direction through intermolecular C—HTrz...NTrz(Trz = triazole) hydrogen bonds, and offset π-stacking interactions between quinoxalinone rings [centroid–centroid distance = 3.9107 (9) Å] and π–π interactions, which are associated pairwise by inversion-related C—HDhydqn...π(ring) (Dhydqn = dihydroquinoxaline) interactions. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H...H (52.7%), H...N/N...H (18.9%) and H...C/C...H (17.0%) interactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document