Prospective Directions of Improving the Process of Decision Making in Business Systems by the Example of Modern Russia

Author(s):  
Olga G. Semenyuta ◽  
Irina V. Orobinskaya ◽  
Neonila M. Shiryaeva ◽  
Yuliya A. Kruchanova
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Landika ◽  
Vanja Sredojević ◽  
Sanel Jakupović

Entrepreneurial activity of transition countries, such as the RS and BiH, is filled with many threats from the environment, particularly concerning the lack of adequate entrepreneurial education, institutional support as well as the communication infrastructure between them and their significant financial impotence.The potential of SME entrepreneurship represents a significant precondition in the development of the national economy as well as the prerequisite of prevention and / or exit from the economic crisis, provided that their potential is exploited by a planned, not uncontrolled approach. Maximizing of market potential and resource capabilities requires the establishment of an adequate decision-making system where problems are solved through planning, selection, application and measuring of the systemic environment from the aspect of significance, while at the same time, taking into account the internal potentialities.Adequate communication between decision-makers with theoretical models and their effective implementation in business planning enables business systems and SME to achieve maximum business efficiency and effectiveness through the optimal combination of their own potential and business environment. The theoretical model is a virtual tool which is used for symbolic - quantitative description of the real system, where the degree of conformity of the model and the reality which we described in it, is the determining factor in the success of real application of the modeled information.The control problem is solved only by an adequate theoretical model that covers, selects, quantifies and functionally linked internal and external factors of “treated” reality. Functional linking of factors in the applied model must be adapted to decision-making conditions, which concerns the conditions of certainty, uncertainty or risk. The classification of decision makers should go into the direction of recognizing input, random and output variables as well as detecting the conditions and forms of their interdependence, adapted to decision-making conditions.The business system is a goal-oriented system that requires optimization at several different levels to achieve system optimal as an adequate synergic suboptimal resultant.The proposed approach is related to the stochastic optimization of the product portfolio harmonized with market potential, and after that the deterministic optimization of production processes in the function of achieving the optimal production portfolio.The payment matrix as a virtual aid, or a brief summary of possible business results, allows the choice of optimal business strategy with maximum approval of model-based prediction and real business results.


Author(s):  
Irina A. Tarasova ◽  
Natalia A. Shchukina ◽  
Oksana A. Avdeyuk ◽  
Vera V. Nekrasova

Author(s):  
Margarita V. Melnik ◽  
Tatiana V. Skryl ◽  
Elena A. Gureeva ◽  
Irina F. Vetrova ◽  
Aleksandr V. Vetrov

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 571-582
Author(s):  
Vlado Galicic ◽  
Ljubica Pilepic

The development of logistics information systems that support decision-making, together with the use of business intelligence, provides assistance and support to logistics managers in the decision process, thereby impacting on the quality of business and productivity. Being better informed and having greater intelligence for decision-making can help to create new value and gain competitive advantage. Logistics business systems in a tourism destination appreciate the importance of information and communication technology in the decision process and seek to develop efficient logistics information systems that will make it possible to take better and more appropriate decisions directly aimed at improving business efficiency and productivity.


Earth ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-34
Author(s):  
Elena A. Mikhailova ◽  
Christopher J. Post ◽  
Mark A. Schlautman ◽  
Gregory C. Post ◽  
Hamdi A. Zurqani

Current applications of the Ecosystems Services (ES) framework to soils are narrowly defined (e.g., soil-based, pedosphere-based, etc.), and focus on soil properties while treating soil as a closed system. Because soil is an open system, it receives and loses matter across its boundaries within Earth’s spheres (atmosphere, biosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, ecosphere, and anthroposphere), which also need to be accounted for in economic analysis. In market economies, the market transforms resources from the Earth’s pedosphere and related spheres into goods and services for societal welfare with non-market institutions mediating human and environmental interactions. These transformations and mediations can result not only in welfare but damages as well. The concept of soil ES and ecosystem disservices (ED) is a human-centered framework, which can be a useful tool in business decision-making. Soil ES (e.g., provisioning, regulation/ maintenance, and cultural) are used to produce goods and services, but the value of these ES and ED are not always accounted for as a part of business decision-making. The objective of this review is to illustrate the monetary valuation of ecosystem services of soil systems (SS) with examples based on the organizational hierarchy of soil systems. The organizational hierarchy of soil systems can be used in economic valuations of soil ES by scale (e.g., world, continent), time (e.g., soil, geologic), qualitative and quantitative degrees of computation (e.g., mental, verbal, descriptive, mathematical, deterministic, stochastic), and degree of complexity (e.g., mechanistic, empirical). Soil survey databases, soil analyses, Soil Data Systems (SDS), and Soil Business Systems (SBS) provide tools and a wide range of quantitative/qualitative data and information to evaluate goods and services for various business applications, but these sources of soil data may be limited in scope due to their static nature. Valuation of soil resources based on soil and non-soil science databases (e.g., National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) databases, etc.) is critically needed to account for these ES/ED as part of business decision-making to provide more sustainable use of soil resources. Since most ecosystems on Earth have been modified by human activity, “soil systems goods and services” (SSGS) may be a more applicable term to describe soil contributions (benefits/damages) to economic activity, compared to a term such as “soil ecosystem goods and services.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document