Factors associated with smoking and smoking cessation among primary care patients with depression: a naturalistic cohort study

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28
Author(s):  
Gail Gilchrist ◽  
Sandra Davidson ◽  
Aves Middleton ◽  
Helen Herrman ◽  
Kelsey Hegarty ◽  
...  

Purpose – People with a history of depression are more likely to smoke and less likely to achieve abstinence from smoking long term. The purpose of this paper is to understand the factors associated with smoking and smoking cessation among patients with depression. Design/methodology/approach – This paper reports on smoking prevalence and cessation in a cohort of 789 primary care attendees with depressive symptoms (Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score of=16) recruited from 30 randomly selected Primary Care Practices in Victoria, Australia in 2005. Findings – At baseline, 32 per cent of participants smoked. Smokers were more likely to be male, unmarried, receive government benefits, have difficulty managing on available income, have emphysema, a chronic illness, poor self-rated health, to have more severe depressive and anxiety symptoms, to be taking anti-depressants, to be hazardous drinkers, to report suicidal ideation and to have experienced childhood physical or sexual abuse. At 12 months, 20 participants reported quitting. Females and people with good or better self-rated health were significantly more likely to have quit, while people with a chronic illness or suicidal ideation were less likely to quit. Smoking cessation was not associated with increases in depression or anxiety symptoms. Only six participants remained quit over four years. Practical implications – Rates of smoking were high, and long-term cessation was low among primary care patients with depressive symptoms. Primary care physicians should provide additional monitoring and support to assist smokers with depression quit and remain quit. Originality/value – This is the first naturalistic study of smoking patterns among primary care attendees with depressive symptoms.

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-381
Author(s):  
Sandra K Davidson ◽  
Helena Romaniuk ◽  
Patty Chondros ◽  
Christopher Dowrick ◽  
Jane Pirkis ◽  
...  

Background: In light of emerging evidence questioning the safety of antidepressants, it is timely to investigate the appropriateness of antidepressant prescribing. This study estimated the prevalence of possible over- and under-treatment with antidepressants among primary care attendees and investigated the factors associated with potentially inappropriate antidepressant use. Methods: In all, 789 adult primary care patients with depressive symptoms were recruited from 30 general practices in Victoria, Australia, in 2005 and followed up every 3 months in 2006 and annually from 2007 to 2011. For this study, we first assessed appropriateness of antidepressant use in 2007 at the 2-year follow-up to enable history of depression to be taken into account, providing 574 (73%) patients with five yearly assessments, resulting in a total of 2870 assessments. We estimated the prevalence of use of antidepressants according to the adapted National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines and used regression analysis to identify factors associated with possible over- and under-treatment. Results: In 41% (243/586) of assessments where antidepressants were indicated according to adapted National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, patients reported not taking them. Conversely in a third (557/1711) of assessments where guideline criteria were unlikely to be met, participants reported antidepressant use. Being female and chronic physical illness were associated with antidepressant use where guideline criteria were not met, but no factors were associated with not taking antidepressants where guideline criteria were met. Conclusions: Much antidepressant treatment in general practice is for people with minimal or mild symptoms, while people with moderate or severe depressive symptoms may miss out. There is considerable scope for improving depression care through better allocation of antidepressant treatment.


JAMA ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 291 (9) ◽  
pp. 1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha L. Bruce ◽  
Thomas R. Ten Have ◽  
Charles F. Reynolds III ◽  
Ira I. Katz ◽  
Herbert C. Schulberg ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Broström ◽  
Ola Sunnergren ◽  
Kristofer Årestedt ◽  
Peter Johansson ◽  
Martin Ulander ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 246 ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ina-Maria Rückert-Eheberg ◽  
Karoline Lukaschek ◽  
Katja Brenk-Franz ◽  
Bernhard Strauß ◽  
Jochen Gensichen

2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph W. Swindle ◽  
Jaya K. Rao ◽  
Ahdy Helmy ◽  
Laurie Plue ◽  
X. H. Zhou ◽  
...  

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of integrating generalist and specialist care for veterans with depression. Method: We conducted a randomized trial of patients screening positive for depression at two Veterans Affairs Medical Center general medicine clinic firms. Control firm physicians were notified prior to the encounter when eligible patients had PRIME-MD depression diagnoses. In the intervention firm, a mental health clinical nurse specialist (CNS) was to: design a treatment plan; implement that plan with the primary care physician; and monitor patients via telephone or visits at two weeks, one month and two months. Primary outcomes (depressive symptoms, patient satisfaction with health care) were collected at 3 and 12 months. Results: Of 268 randomized patients, 246 (92%) and 222 (83%) completed 3- and 12-month follow-up interviews. There were no between-group differences in depressive symptoms or satisfaction at 3 or 12 months. The intervention group had greater chart documentation of depression at baseline (63% versus 33%, p = 0.003) and a higher referral rate to mental health services at 3 months (27% versus 9%, p = 0.019). There was no difference in the rate of new prescriptions for, or adequate dosing of, anti-depressant medications. In 40% of patients, CNSs disagreed with the PRIME-MD depression diagnosis, and their rates of watchful waiting were correspondingly high. Conclusions: Implementing an integrated care model did not occur as intended. Experienced CNSs often did not see the need for treatment in many primary care patients identified by the PRIME-MD. Integrating integrated care models in actual practice may prove challenging.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karon F. Cook ◽  
Michael A. Kallen ◽  
Charles Bombardier ◽  
Alyssa M. Bamer ◽  
Seung W. Choi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 205873921984435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Lodin ◽  
Mats Lekander ◽  
Predrag Petrovic ◽  
Gustav Nilsonne ◽  
Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf ◽  
...  

This study investigated associations between inflammatory markers, sickness behaviour, health anxiety and self-rated health in 311 consecutive primary care patients. Poor self-rated health was associated with high sickness behaviour ( ρ = 0.28, P < 0.001; ρ = 0.42, P = 0.003) and high health anxiety ( ρ = 0.31, P < 0.001; ρ = –0.32, P = 0.003). High levels of interleukin 6 were associated with poor self-rated health in men ( ρ = 0.26, P = 0.009). Low levels of interleukin-6 were associated with poor self-rated health in women ( ρ = –0.15, P = 0.04), but this association was non-significant when adjusted for health anxiety ( ρ = –0.08, P = 0.31). These results are consistent with the theory that interoceptive processes draw on both inflammatory mediators and the state of sickness behaviour in inferring health state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document