Cross section of stock returns on Shari’ah-compliant stocks: evidence from Pakistan

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salman Ahmed Shaikh ◽  
Mohd Adib Ismail ◽  
Abdul Ghafar Ismail ◽  
Shahida Shahimi ◽  
Muhammad Hakimi Mohd. Shafiai
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Value Premium ◽  
Expected Returns ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Three Factor

Purpose This paper aims to study the cross section of expected returns on Shari’ah-compliant stocks in Pakistan by using single- and multi-factor asset pricing models. Design/methodology/approach To estimate cross section of expected returns of Shari’ah-compliant stocks, the study uses capital asset pricing model (CAPM), Fama-French three-factor model and Fama-French five-factor model. Data for the period 2001-2015 on 217 companies are used. For the market portfolio, PSX-100 and Dow Jones Islamic Index for Pakistan are used. Findings The study could not find empirical support for CAPM using Lintner (1965), Black et al. (1972) and Fama and Macbeth (1973) approach. Nonetheless, the relation between beta and returns is positive in up-market and negative in down-market. The results of Fama-French three-factor and five-factor models suggest that size premium is positive and significant for explaining the cross section of stock returns of small size stocks, whereas value premium is positive and significant for explaining the cross section of returns of high value stocks. Practical implications The results suggest that fund managers can use Shari’ah-compliant stocks for portfolio diversification and for offering specialized investments given the positive market excess returns and the existence of size and value premium on Shari’ah-compliant stocks. Originality/value This is the first study on Fama-French (2015) five-factor model for Islamic capital markets in Pakistan.

The role of efficiency in capital asset pricing: a research on Nasdaq technology sector

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 1479-1493
Author(s):  
Hakan Aygoren ◽  
Emrah Balkan
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Efficiency Factor ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Three Factor

PurposeThe aim of this study is to investigate the role of efficiency in capital asset pricing. The paper explores the impact of a four-factor model that involves an efficiency factor on the returns of Nasdaq technology firms.Design/methodology/approachThe paper relies on data of 147 firms from July 2007 to June 2017 to examine the impact of efficiency on stock returns. The performances of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), Fama–French three-factor model and the proposed four-factor model are evaluated based on the time series regression method. The parameters such as the GRS F-statistic and adjusted R² are used to compare the relative performances of all models.FindingsThe results show that all factors of the models are found to be valid in asset pricing. Also, the paper provides evidence that the explanatory power of the proposed four-factor model outperforms the explanatory power of the CAPM and Fama–French three-factor model.Originality/valueUnlike most asset pricing studies, this paper presents a new asset pricing model by adding the efficiency factor to the Fama–French three-factor model. It is documented that the efficiency factor increases the predictive ability of stock returns. Evidence implies that investors consider efficiency as one of the main factors in pricing their assets.

scholarly journals Modelos de Precificação de Ativos e o Efeito Liquidez: Evidências Empíricas no Mercado Acionário Brasileiro

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio André Veras Machado ◽  
Otávio Ribeiro de Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Liquidity Premium ◽  
Pricing Models ◽  
Portfolio Returns ◽  
Asset Pricing Models ◽  
Three Factor

This paper is aims to analyze whether a liquidity premium exists in the Brazilian stock market. As a second goal, we include liquidity as an extra risk factor in asset pricing models and test whether this factor is priced and whether stock returns were explained not only by systematic risk, as proposed by the CAPM, by Fama and French’s (1993) three-factor model, and by Carhart’s (1997) momentum-factor model, but also by liquidity, as suggested by Amihud and Mendelson (1986). To achieve this, we used stock portfolios and five measures of liquidity. Among the asset pricing models tested, the CAPM was the least capable of explaining returns. We found that the inclusion of size and book-to-market factors in the CAPM, a momentum factor in the three-factor model, and a liquidity factor in the four-factor model improve their explanatory power of portfolio returns. In addition, we found that the five-factor model is marginally superior to the other asset pricing models tested.

Who is King in Factor Zoo? Case of the Chinese Stock Market

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-102
Author(s):  
Simon M. S. So
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Market ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Investment Strategy ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Chinese Stock Market ◽  
Fama And French ◽  
Three Factor

This paper aimed to evaluate and compare individual performances and contributions of seven well-known factors, selected from four widely cited asset pricing models: (1) the capital asset pricing model of Sharpe (1964), (2) the three-factor model of Fama and French (1993) the augmented four-factor model of Carhart (1997), (3) the five-factor model of Fama and French (2015), and (4) the illiquidity model of Amihud, et al. (2015) in capturing the time-series variation of stock returns and absorbing the 12 prominent anomalies. The anomalies were constructed by forming long-short portfolios, and regressions were run to examine their monthly returns from 2000 to 2019. We found that there is no definite and absolute “king” in the factor zoo in the Chinese stock market, and size is the relative “king” that can absorb the maximum number of anomalies. Evidence also indicates that the three-factor model of Fama and French may still play an important role in pricing assets in the Chinese stock market. The results can provide investors with a reliable risk factor and help investors form an effective investment strategy. This paper contributes to asset pricing literature in the Chinese market.G1

scholarly journals Technology prospect and the cross-section of stock returns: evidence from the Australian market

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 295-303
Author(s):  
Qi Shi ◽  
Ali F. Darrat ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Richard Chung
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Factor Models ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Three Factor

We examine the link between technology prospect and stock returns in the Australian market. Our results suggest that the technology-based asset pricing model outperforms the CAPM and Fama-French three-factor models in explaining the cross-section of the Australian Fama-French 25 size/book-to-market portfolios. The results prove robust to using alternative estimation methods and continue to supports the importance of the technology factor for shaping the cross section of the Fama-French portfolios returns.

scholarly journals Role of leverage and liquidity risk in asset pricing: evidence from Indian stock market

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehak Jain ◽  
Ravi Singla
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Pricing Models ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Asset Pricing Models ◽  
Three Factor ◽  
Better Than

Purpose Asset pricing revolves around the core aspects of risk and expected return. The main objective of the study is to test different asset pricing models for the Indian securities market. This paper aims to analyse whether leverage and liquidity augmented five-factor model performs better than Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), Fama and French three-factor model, leverage augmented four-factor model and liquidity augmented four-factor model. Design/methodology/approach The data for the current study comprises records on prices of securities that are part of the Nifty 500 index for a time frame of 14 years, that is, from October 2004 to September 2017 consisting of 183 companies using time series regression. Findings The results indicate that the five-factor model performs better than CAPM and the three-factor model. The model outperforms leverage augmented and liquidity augmented four-factor models. The empirical evidence shows that the five-factor model has the highest explanatory power among the entire asset pricing models considered. Practical implications The present study bears certain useful implications for various stakeholders including fund managers, investors and academicians. Originality/value This study presents a five-factor model containing two additional factors, that is, leverage and liquidity risk along with the Fama-French three-factor model. These factors are expected to give more value to the model in comparison to the Fama-French three-factor model.

Fewer reasons to sin: a five-factor investigation of vice stock returns

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1016-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Richey
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
National Defense ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Three Factor

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the return performance of a portfolio of US “vice stocks,” firms that manufacture and sell products such as alcohol, tobacco, gaming services, national defense and firearms, adult entertainment, and payday lenders. Design/methodology/approach Using daily return data from a portfolio of vice stocks over the period 1987-2016, the author computes the Jensen’s α (capital asset pricing model (CAPM)), Fama-French Three-Factor, Carhart Four-Factor, and Fama-French Five-Factor results for the complete portfolio, and each vice industry individually. Findings The results from the CAPM, Fama-French Three-Factor Model, and the Carhart Four-Factor Model show a positive and significant α for the vice portfolio throughout the sample period. However, the α’s significance disappears with the addition of the explanatory variables from the Fama-French Five-Factor Model. Originality/value The author provides academics and practitioners with results from a new model. As of this writing, the author is unaware of any articles published in peer-reviewed academic journals that investigate vice stocks within the framework of the Fama-French Five-Factor Model (2015). First, the existing literature does not shed light on the relationship between “profitability” and “aggressiveness” (the fourth and fifth factors of the Fama-French Model) and vice stock returns. Second, within the framework of the Fama-French Five-Factor Model, the author shows results not only from a portfolio of vice stocks, but from various vice industries as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document