Continuous current source inversion of evoked potential fields in a spherical model head

1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 997-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Srebro
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-101
Author(s):  
Agnes Mbonyiryivuze

We investigate students’ misconceptions in electrostatics, direct current (DC) and magnetism which are important in electricity and magnetism. We developed and administered a multiple-choice questionnaire test to reveal students’ misconceptions related to charged bodies, lightning, electric fields, electric potential, forces, DC resistive electric circuits and magnets. This test aimed at obtaining quantitative information about misconceptions and was administered to 380 senior two students from Nine Year Basic Education (9YBE) Schools. The selected students have some experience with the new Rwandan secondary physics Competence Based Curriculum (CBC) that is currently under implementation. We find that senior two students have several common misconceptions related to these concepts. The data indicate that although students have some backgrounds on the subject matter, they still seem to believe that if the two charges are separated by a distance, a large-charged object exerts a greater force of attraction or repulsion on the small one. Considerable number of participated students held the misconception of considering current consumption in the resistor/bulb or the electrical devices in the circuits. They also believed that the battery was a continuous current source. The findings also revealed that students held a misconception that a bar magnet when broken into pieces, it is demagnetized. Moreover, a considerable number of participants hold the misconception that all metals are attracted by a magnet. Our study also revealed some of the statistically significant differences in terms of either gender or location of schools for some items.


1993 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 509-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Srebro ◽  
R.M. Oguz ◽  
K. Hughlett ◽  
P.D. Purdy

1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Skrandies

Author(s):  
Sulmer Fernandez-Gutierrez ◽  
Jim Browning ◽  
Ming-Chieh Lin ◽  
David N. Smithe ◽  
Jack Watrous

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Skrandies

Three-dimensional depth perception relies in part on the binocular fusion of horizontally disparate stimuli presented to the left and right eye. The mammalian visual system offers a unique possibility to study electrophysiologically cortical neuronal mechanisms: since the input of the two eyes remains separated up to the level of the visual cortex, evoked potential components that are generated exclusively by cortical structures may be explored when dynamic random-dot stereograms (dRDS) are presented. In a series of independent studies, we determined the scalp topography of dRDS evoked brain activity in different groups of healthy subjects, and we found consistent results. Major differences between stereoscopic and contrast evoked brain activity are seen in the strength of the potential fields as well as in their topography. Our findings suggest that there are fewer neurons in the human visual cortex that are responsive to horizontal disparity, and that higher visual areas like V2 are more engaged with stereoscopic processing than the primary visual cortex. On the other hand, component latencies of evoked brain activity show no effect signifying that the binocular information flow to the visual cortex has a similar time course for both the processing of contrast information and of dRDS stimuli. We could also verify that healthy subjects can learn to perceive 3D structure contained in dRDS. Changes in perceptual ability as measured with psychophysical tests are paralleled by systematic alterations in the topography of stereoscopically evoked potential fields. Stereoscopic VEP recordings may also be of clinical use: in patients with selectively disturbed depth perception but normal visual acuity there is a high correlation between clinical symptoms, perceptual deficiency, and altered VEP amplitudes and latencies.


1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 443
Author(s):  
R. Srebro ◽  
R.M. Oguz ◽  
K. Hughlett ◽  
N.B. Sanders ◽  
P.D. Purdy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document