scholarly journals Industries Return and Volatility Spillover in Chinese Stock Market: An Early Warning Signal of Systemic Risk

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 9046-9056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng He ◽  
Zhifeng Liu ◽  
Sicen Chen
2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1307-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Gamache ◽  
Gerry McNamara ◽  
Scott D. Graffin ◽  
Jason Kiley ◽  
Jerayr Haleblian ◽  
...  

Chemoecology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meaghan A. Vavrek ◽  
Chris K. Elvidge ◽  
Robert DeCaire ◽  
Brenna Belland ◽  
Christopher D. Jackson ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 105 (38) ◽  
pp. 14308-14312 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Dakos ◽  
M. Scheffer ◽  
E. H. van Nes ◽  
V. Brovkin ◽  
V. Petoukhov ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilis Dakos ◽  
Egbert H. van Nes ◽  
Marten Scheffer

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-133
Author(s):  
Hongjun Zeng

This article examines the linkage and volatility spillover among Chinese Stock Market Monthly Return and Investor Sentiment, investigating the effect dynamic links of various investor sentiment indicators and Chinese stock market return volatility. Employing the DCC and BEKK GARCH, we find investor sentiment is to some extent linked to the yield fluctuations of the Chinese stock market, but the volatility spillover is relatively weak. In the test period (2005-2020), we observe that several indicators do not explain their linkage effects with CSI 300 index of return fluctuations and volatility spillovers well, with no indicators can reflect both of these effects. Most indicators are linkage with the CSI 300 index, especially consumer confidence index (CCI), new investor account openings last month (NIA) and the volume of transactions last month (TURN) have significant linkage effects with the CSI 300 index. We also find that only the CCI index has a one-way volatility spillover on the CSI 300 index, and the CSI 300 index has no volatility spillover on any indicator.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document