Study on Material and Energy Flow in Steel Forging Production Process

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 12921-12932
Author(s):  
Fei He ◽  
Xiaomei Ma ◽  
Kang Shen ◽  
Can Wang
1920 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
A. R. Surface
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 50-53
Author(s):  
N.N. Martynov ◽  
◽  
G.A. Sidorenko ◽  
G.B. Zinyukhin ◽  
E.Sh. Maneeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-55
Author(s):  
Ika Yulianti ◽  
Endah Masrunik ◽  
Anam Miftakhul Huda ◽  
Diana Elvianita

This study aims to find a comparison of the calculation of the cost of goods manufactured in the CV. Mitra Setia Blitar uses the company's method and uses the Job Order Costing (JOC) method. The method used in this study is quantitative. The types of data used are quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative data is in the form of map production cost data while qualitative data is in the form of information about map production process. The result of calculating the cost of production of the map between the two methods results in a difference of Rp. 306. Calculation using the company method is more expensive than using the Job Order Costing method. Calculation of cost of goods manufactured using the company method is Rp. 2,205,000, - or Rp. 2,205, - each unit. While using the Job Order Costing (JOC) method is Rp. 1,899,000, - or Rp 1,899, - each unit. So that the right method used in calculating the cost of production is the Job Order Costing (JOC) method


Científica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Marani Barbosa ◽  
Bruno Guilherme Torres Licursi Vieira ◽  
Francisco Guilhien Gomes-Junior ◽  
Roberval Daiton Vieira

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document