scholarly journals Geopotential Determination Based on Precise Point Positioning Time Comparison: A Case Study Using Simulated Observation

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 204283-204294
Author(s):  
Chenghui Cai ◽  
Wen-Bin Shen ◽  
Ziyu Shen ◽  
Wei Xu
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1856-1873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel M. Capilla ◽  
José Luis Berné ◽  
Angel Martín ◽  
Raul Rodrigo

GPS Solutions ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulong Ge ◽  
Feng Zhou ◽  
Tianjun Liu ◽  
WeiJin Qin ◽  
Shengli Wang ◽  
...  

Measurement ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 628-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulong Ge ◽  
Feng Zhou ◽  
Peipei Dai ◽  
WeiJin Qin ◽  
Shengli Wang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nistor ◽  
A. S. Buda

Abstract Because of the dynamics of the GPS technique used in different domains like geodesy, near real-time GPS meteorology, geodynamics, the precise point positioning (PPP) becomes more than a powerful method for determining the position, or the delay caused by the atmosphere. The main idea of this method is that we need only one receiver – preferably that have dual frequencies pseudorange and carrier-phase capabilities – to obtain the position. Because we are using only one receiver the majority of the residuals that are eliminated in double differencing method, we have to estimate them in PPP. The development of the PPP method allows us, to use precise satellite clock estimates, and precise orbits, resulting in a much more efficient way to deal with the disadvantages of this technique, like slow convergence time, or ambiguity resolution. Because this two problem are correlated, to achieve fast convergence we need to resolve the problem of ambiguity resolution. But the accuracy of the PPP results are directly influenced by presence of the uncalibrated phase delays (UPD) originating in the receivers and satellites. In this article we present the GPS errors and biases, the zenith wet delay and the necessary time for obtaining the convergence. The necessary correction are downloaded by using the IGS service.


Measurement ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 398-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cemal Ozer Yigit ◽  
M. Zeki Coskun ◽  
Hakan Yavasoglu ◽  
Abdullah Arslan ◽  
Yunus Kalkan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document