Fast Discrete Diagnostics of EMC of Complex Co-Located Radio Systems by Using Worst-Case Models of Electromagnetic Spurious Couplings

Author(s):  
Vladimir Mordachev ◽  
Eugene Sinkevich ◽  
Dzmitry Tsyanenka ◽  
Yauheni Arlou ◽  
Aliaksandr Svistunou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
J.D. Geller ◽  
C.R. Herrington

The minimum magnification for which an image can be acquired is determined by the design and implementation of the electron optical column and the scanning and display electronics. It is also a function of the working distance and, possibly, the accelerating voltage. For secondary and backscattered electron images there are usually no other limiting factors. However, for x-ray maps there are further considerations. The energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometers (EDS) have a much larger solid angle of detection that for WDS. They also do not suffer from Bragg’s Law focusing effects which limit the angular range and focusing distance from the diffracting crystal. In practical terms EDS maps can be acquired at the lowest magnification of the SEM, assuming the collimator does not cutoff the x-ray signal. For WDS the focusing properties of the crystal limits the angular range of acceptance of the incident x-radiation. The range is dependent upon the 2d spacing of the crystal, with the acceptance angle increasing with 2d spacing. The natural line width of the x-ray also plays a role. For the metal layered crystals used to diffract soft x-rays, such as Be - O, the minimum magnification is approximately 100X. In the worst case, for the LEF crystal which diffracts Ti - Zn, ˜1000X is the minimum.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Savelli ◽  
Susan Joslyn ◽  
Limor Nadav-Greenberg ◽  
Queena Chen

2012 ◽  
Vol E95-B (4) ◽  
pp. 1190-1197
Author(s):  
Hiromasa FUJII ◽  
Hiroki HARADA ◽  
Shunji MIURA ◽  
Hidetoshi KAYAMA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document