Task-driven Image Preprocessing Algorithm Evaluation Strategy

Author(s):  
PengQi Wang ◽  
Lin Geng ◽  
DongBo Zhao ◽  
ShuTing Kang ◽  
Qian Dong ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1706-1708
Author(s):  
Peng ZHANG ◽  
Jun ZHONG ◽  
An-ming GUO ◽  
Qiang PENG
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Xiaolin Tang ◽  
Xiaogang Wang ◽  
Jin Hou ◽  
Huafeng Wu ◽  
Ping He

Introduction: Under complex illumination conditions such as poor light sources and light changes rapidly, there are two disadvantages of current gamma transform in preprocessing face image: one is that the parameters of transformation need to be set based on experience; the other is the details of the transformed image are not obvious enough. Objective: Improve the current gamma transform. Methods: This paper proposes a weighted fusion algorithm of adaptive gamma transform and edge feature extraction. First, this paper proposes an adaptive gamma transform algorithm for face image preprocessing, that is, the parameter of transformation generated by calculation according to the specific gray value of the input face image. Secondly, this paper uses Sobel edge detection operator to extract the edge information of the transformed image to get the edge detection image. Finally, this paper uses the adaptively transformed image and the edge detection image to obtain the final processing result through a weighted fusion algorithm. Results: The contrast of the face image after preprocessing is appropriate, and the details of the image are obvious. Conclusion: The method proposed in this paper can enhance the face image while retaining more face details, without human-computer interaction, and has lower computational complexity degree.


Author(s):  
Jeasik Cho

This chapter discusses three ongoing issues related to the evaluation of qualitative research. First, the chapter considers whether a set of evaluation criteria is either determinative or changeable. Due to the evolving nature of qualitative research, it is likely that the way in which qualitative research is evaluated can change—not all at once, but gradually. Second, qualitative research has been criticized by newly resurrected positivists whose definitions of scientific research and evaluation criteria are narrow. “Politics of evidence” and a recent big-tent evaluation strategy are examined. Last, this chapter analyzes how validity criteria of qualitative research are incorporated into the evaluation of mixed methods research. The elements of qualitative research seem to be fairly represented but are largely treated as trivial. A criterion, the fit of research questions to design, is identified as distinctive in the review guide of the Journal of Mixed Methods Research.


2021 ◽  
pp. 102555
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa Gomes Barbosa ◽  
Vicente Junio Rosse ◽  
Naíra Gaudereto Laurindo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document