Electrical loss minimization technique for wind generators based on a comprehensive dynamic modelling of induction machines

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Di Piazza ◽  
M. Luna ◽  
M. Pucci
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Modelling ◽  
Induction Machines ◽  
Loss Minimization ◽  
Wind Generators ◽  
Minimization Technique ◽  
Electrical Loss

Growing Neural Gas-Based MPPT of Variable Pitch Wind Generators With Induction Machines

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 1006-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Cirrincione ◽  
Marcello Pucci ◽  
Gianpaolo Vitale
Keyword(s):  
Induction Machines ◽  
Growing Neural Gas ◽  
Variable Pitch ◽  
Neural Gas ◽  
Wind Generators

Loss Minimization of Induction Machines in Dynamic Operation

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 726-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Francois Stumper ◽  
Alexander Dotlinger ◽  
Ralph Kennel
Keyword(s):  
Induction Machines ◽  
Loss Minimization ◽  
Dynamic Operation

scholarly journals Adaptive-Loss minimization control for speed sensorless induction machines

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-44
Author(s):  
Phuong Minh Le ◽  
Phong Hoai Nguyen ◽  
Hung Ngoc Dang
Keyword(s):  
Induction Machines ◽  
Control Model ◽  
Loss Minimization ◽  
Speed Sensorless ◽  
Load Range ◽  
Resistance Change ◽  
Adaptive Models ◽  
Rotor Flux ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Stator Resistance

This paper presents a new online loss-minimization algorithm in the adaptive control model for speed sensorless based on the Direct Rotor Flux Oriented Control (DRFOC) with optimum flux in the condition of do variable stator resistance. The paper also presents a new approach to develop a reference and adaptive models to estimate the speed and to observe stator resistance change. Simulation results in Matlab Simulink showed good adaptability of the presented model controls even when the stator resistance changes to up 200% of rated. In addition, using the proposed algorithm allows reducing losses and improving efficiency of proposed control model in comparison with DRFOC traditional model for load range 0-70% of the rated. Where the difference of efficient can reach 42%, and the difference in loss to 85%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document