Influence of phase coupling on the performance of 8/6 SRM

Author(s):  
Dragan S. Mihic ◽  
Bogdan M. Brkovic ◽  
Terzic V. Mladen ◽  
Zarko V. Koprivica
Keyword(s):  
1988 ◽  
Vol 202 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob D. Bekenstein
Keyword(s):  

1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 1492-1501 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. E. Corke ◽  
A. F. Hildebrandt

Author(s):  
Stuart J. Mills ◽  
Andrew G. Christy ◽  
Georges Favreau ◽  
Valérie Galea-Clolus

A new superstructure of the mineral camerolaite, Cu6Al3(OH)18(H2O)2[Sb(OH)6](SO4), has been refined in space groupP\bar 1 with unit-cell parametersaP= 7.7660 (16),bP= 8.759 (4),cP= 11.306 (2) Å, αP= 108.67 (4), βP= 83.41 (3), γP= 126.64 (2)°,V= 581.6 (3) Å3andZ= 1, withR1= 0.0951 (all data). This is the first refined example of a cyanotrichite-group mineral in which long-range order of interlayer anions produces a superstructure alongb, although diffuse scattering has previously been reported that corresponds to short-range order. Though the structure shares with other members of the cyanotrichite group a structural unit in which ribbons of edge-sharing Cu and Al octahedra form layers || (001), the superstructure arises from regular alternation of [SO4] and [Sb(OH)6] polyhedra along rods that lie between the layers, and phase coupling between rods that maximizes the distance between [SO4] groups of adjacent rods alongaandcdirections. This arrangement suggests an alternative nearly orthogonal choice of unit cell inF\bar 1 with parametersaF= 12.473 (26),bF= 8.759 (4),cF= 21.476 (7) Å, αF= 85.94 (4), βF= 95.91 (5), γF= 92.34 (9)°, which is recommended for comparing this structural variety of camerolaite with other members of the group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document