Instrumentation of Surgical Tools To Measure Load and Position During Incision, Tissue Retraction, and Suturing

Author(s):  
Tyler Schimmoeller ◽  
Ki-Hyun Cho ◽  
Robb Colbrunn ◽  
Tara Nagle ◽  
Erica Neumann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Konrad Malinowski ◽  
Jan Paszkowski ◽  
Marcin Mostowy ◽  
Adrian Góralczyk ◽  
Robert F. LaPrade ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1167-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald L. Wolf ◽  
George W. Sidebotham ◽  
Jackson L. P. Lazard ◽  
Jean G. Charchaflieh

Background Operating room fires fueled by surgical drapes and ignited by high-energy surgical tools in air and oxygen-enriched atmospheres continue to occur. Methods The authors examined the time to ignition of huck towels and three commonly used surgical drape materials in air, 50% oxygen, and 95% oxygen using a carbon dioxide surgical laser as an ignition source. In addition, a phenol-polymer fabric was tested. Results In air, polypropylene and phenol polymer do not ignite. For polypropylene, the laser instantly vaporized a hole, and therefore, interaction between the laser and material ceased. When tested in combination with another material, the polypropylene time to ignition assumed the behavior of the material with which it was combined. For phenol polymer, the laser did not penetrate the material. Huck towels, cotton-polyester, and non-woven cellulose-polyester ignited in air with decreasing times to ignition. All tested materials ignited in 50% and 95% oxygen. Conclusion The results of this study reveal that with increasing oxygen concentration, the time to ignition becomes shorter, and the consequences become more severe. The possibility exists for manufacturers to develop drape materials that are safer than existing materials.


Author(s):  
Randy Lee ◽  
Roberta L. Klatzky ◽  
George D. Stetten

Author(s):  
Luis C. García-Peraza-Herrera ◽  
Wenqi Li ◽  
Caspar Gruijthuijsen ◽  
Alain Devreker ◽  
George Attilakos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Grad ◽  
Aleksandra Paruzel-Pliskowska ◽  
Andrzej Żegleń ◽  
Jolanta Pytko-Polończyk

Tooth extraction is one of the most common dental surgical procedures. Its success depends on the operator’s knowledge, skills and experience. Proper choice of tools is also important. Incorrect tooth extraction using excessive force may cause local complications, such as damage to the soft tissue or to the extracted or neighbouring tooth with potential translocation, bone fracture, formation of an oral sinus communication or even mandibular dislocation. Currently, efforts are being made to develop methods that will allow for the preservation of intact surrounding periodontal tissues to facilitate subsequent prosthetic rehabilitation. Surgical tools used in atraumatic tooth extraction include, among other things, Physics Forceps, periotomes, luxators, and the Benex extractor system. These tools reduce the risk of damage to the vestibular lamina of the alveolar bone, allow for avoiding the need for a mucoperiosteal flap and reduce the incidence of postoperative pain. This helps create optimal conditions for subsequent implant prosthetic reconstruction. The paper presents the characteristics and application of selected tools used in atraumatic tooth extraction.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Kristian Holm Andersen ◽  
Kim Lindberg Schwaner ◽  
Thiusius Rajeeth Savarimuthu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document