EMG-based Continuous Prediction of the Upper Limb Elbow Joint Angle Using GRNN

Author(s):  
Shuxiang Guo ◽  
Ziyi Yang ◽  
Yi Liu
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muye Pang ◽  
Shuxiang Guo ◽  
Qiang Huang ◽  
Hidenori Ishihara ◽  
Hideyuki Hirata

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Qiuzhi Song ◽  
Xiaoguang Wang ◽  
Pengzhan Liu

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 413-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davis A. Forman ◽  
Daniel Abdel-Malek ◽  
Christopher M. F. Bunce ◽  
Michael W. R. Holmes

Forearm rotation (supination/pronation) alters corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii, but it is unclear whether corticospinal excitability is influenced by joint angle, muscle length, or both. Thus the purpose of this study was to separately examine elbow joint angle and muscle length on corticospinal excitability. Corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii was measured using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation. Spinal excitability was measured using cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited via transmastoid electrical stimulation. Elbow angles were manipulated with a fixed biceps brachii muscle length (and vice versa) across five unique postures: 1) forearm neutral, elbow flexion 90°; 2) forearm supinated, elbow flexion 90°; 3) forearm pronated, elbow flexion 90°; 4) forearm supinated, elbow flexion 78°; and 5) forearm pronated, elbow flexion 113°. A musculoskeletal model determined biceps brachii muscle length for postures 1–3, and elbow joint angles ( postures 4–5) were selected to maintain biceps length across forearm orientations. MEPs and CMEPs were elicited at rest and during an isometric contraction of 10% of maximal biceps muscle activity. At rest, MEP amplitudes to the biceps were largest during supination, which was independent of elbow joint angle. CMEP amplitudes were not different when the elbow was fixed at 90° but were largest in pronation when muscle length was controlled. During an isometric contraction, there were no significant differences across forearm postures for either MEP or CMEP amplitudes. These results highlight that elbow joint angle and biceps brachii muscle length can each independently influence spinal excitability. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Changes in upper limb posture can influence the responsiveness of the central nervous system to artificial stimulations. We established a novel approach integrating neurophysiology techniques with biomechanical modeling. Through this approach, the effects of elbow joint angle and biceps brachii muscle length on corticospinal and spinal excitability were assessed. We demonstrate that spinal excitability is uniquely influenced by joint angle and muscle length, and this highlights the importance of accounting for muscle length in neurophysiological studies.


Author(s):  
Masatoshi Seki ◽  
Yuya Matsumoto ◽  
Takeshi Ando ◽  
Yo Kobayashi ◽  
Masakatsu G. Fujie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Jin Seo ◽  
Mojtaba F. Fathi ◽  
Pilwon Hur ◽  
Vincent Crocher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document