Measuring Heterogeneity in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Images for Classifying Metastatic and Benign Bone Lesions in Patients with Cervical Cancer

Purpose Heterogeneity assessment can be applied for medical imaging analysis. Here, we evaluated first-order and texture analysis (TA) metrics in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for classification of metastatic and benign bone lesions in patients with cervical cancer. Methods The data of 18F-FDG PET studies performed on a specific PET/CT system from 2016 to 2018 in patients with cervical cancer were retrieved. The data of bone lesions extracted from studies over 2016–2017 and 2018 were used as training and validation datasets, respectively. Metastatic bone lesions were identified in each dataset, with an equal number of benign bone lesions selected. Cuboid volume of interest (VOI) consisting of 3 × 3 × 5 reconstructed voxels was applied for first-order metrics, and cubic VOI consisting of smaller voxels with trilinear interpolation of standardized uptake value (SUV) was adopted for TA metrics. First-order metrics included the maximum SUV (SUVmax) of lesions and the mean voxel SUV and its standard deviation (SUVsd), skewness, and kurtosis in VOI. In total, 4464 TA metrics based on 62 texture features were evaluated. Logistic regression was used for classification with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as the performance measure. Results From the training and validation datasets, 98 and 42 metastatic bone lesions were identified, respectively. SUVsd demonstrated higher performance than did SUVmax in both the training (AUC .798 vs .732, P = .001) and validation (AUC .786 vs .684, P < .001) datasets. Top-performing TA metrics demonstrated significantly higher performance in the training dataset, but not in the validation dataset. Conclusion A simple first-order measure of heterogeneity, SUVsd, was found to be superior to SUVmax for the classification of metastatic and benign bone lesions. Multiple hypothesis testing can result in false-positive findings in TA with multiple features and parameters; careful validation is required.

Electrical Impedance Tomography Analysis Between Two Similar Respiratory System Compliance During Decremetal PEEP Titration in ARDS Patients

Purpose The positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level with best respiratory system compliance (Crs) is frequently used for PEEP selection in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. On occasion, two similar best Crs (where the difference between the Crs of two PEEP levels is < 1 ml/cm H2O) may be identified during decremental PEEP titration. Selecting PEEP under such conditions is challenging. The aim of this study was to provide supplementary rationale for PEEP selection by assessing the global and regional ventilation distributions between two PEEP levels in this situation. Methods Eight ARDS cases with similar best Crs at two different PEEP levels were analyzed using examination-specific electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measures and airway stress index (SIaw). Five Crs were measured at PEEP values of 25 cm H2O (PEEP25), 20 cm H2O (PEEP20), 15 cm H2O (PEEPH), 11 cm H2O (PEEPI), and 7 cm H2O (PEEPL). The higher PEEP value of the two PEEPs with similar best Crs was designated as PEEPupper, while the lower designated as PEEPlower. Results PEEPH and PEEPI shared the best Crs in two cases, while similar Crs was found at PEEPI and PEEPL in the remaining six cases. SIaw was higher with PEEPupper as compared to PEEPlower (1.06 ± 0.10 versus 0.99 ± 0.09, p = 0.05). Proportion of lung hyperdistension was significantly higher with PEEPupper than PEEPlower (7.0 ± 5.1% versus 0.3 ± 0.5%, p = 0.0002). In contrast, proportion of recruitable lung collapse was higher with PEEPlower than PEEPupper (18.6 ± 4.4% versus 5.9 ± 3.7%, p < 0.0001). Cyclic alveolar collapse and reopening during tidal breathing was higher at PEEPlower than PEEPupper (34.4 ± 19.3% versus 16.0 ± 9.1%, p = 0.046). The intratidal gas distribution (ITV) index was also significantly higher at PEEPlower than PEEPupper (2.6 ± 1.3 versus 1.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.042). Conclusions PEEPupper is a rational selection in ARDS cases with two similar best Crs. EIT provides additional information for the selection of PEEP in such circumstances.

An Image Quality Comparison Study Between Homemade and Commercial Dental Cone-Beam CT Systems

Purpose Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been widely applied in dental and maxillofacial imaging. Several dental CBCT systems have been recently developed in order to improve the performance. This study aimed to evaluate the image quality of our prototype (YMU-DENT-P001) and compare with a commercial POYE Expert 3DS dental CBCT system (system A). Methods The Micro-CT Contrast Scale, Micro-CT Water and Micro-CT HA phantoms were used to evaluate the two CBCT systems in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), uniformity (U), distortion, and linearity in the relationship between image intensity and calcium hydroxyapatite concentration. We also fabricated a proprietary thin-wire phantom to evaluate full width at half maximum (FWHM) spatial resolution. Both CBCT systems used the same exposure protocol, and data analysis was performed in accordance with ISO standards using a proprietary image analysis platform. Results The SNR of our prototype system was nearly five times higher than that of system A (prototype: 159.85 ± 3.88; A: 35.42 ± 0.61; p < 0.05) and the CNR was three times higher (prototype: 329.39 ± 5.55; A: 100.29 ± 2.31; p < 0.05). The spatial resolution of the prototype (0.2446 mm) greatly exceeded that of system A (0.5179 mm) and image distortion was lower (prototype: 0.03 mm; system A: 0.285 mm). Little difference was observed between the two systems in terms of the linear relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and image intensity. Conclusions Within the scope of this study, our prototype YMU-DENT-P001 outperformed system A in terms of spatial resolution, SNR, CNR, and image distortion.