Predicting tropical forest carbon from EO-1 hyperspectral imagery in Noel Kempff Mercado National Park, Bolivia

Author(s):  
J.R. Foster ◽  
C.C. Kingdon ◽  
P.A. Townsend
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1571-1585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Ploton ◽  
Nicolas Barbier ◽  
Stéphane Takoudjou Momo ◽  
Maxime Réjou-Méchain ◽  
Faustin Boyemba Bosela ◽  
...  

Abstract. Accurately monitoring tropical forest carbon stocks is a challenge that remains outstanding. Allometric models that consider tree diameter, height and wood density as predictors are currently used in most tropical forest carbon studies. In particular, a pantropical biomass model has been widely used for approximately a decade, and its most recent version will certainly constitute a reference model in the coming years. However, this reference model shows a systematic bias towards the largest trees. Because large trees are key drivers of forest carbon stocks and dynamics, understanding the origin and the consequences of this bias is of utmost concern. In this study, we compiled a unique tree mass data set of 673 trees destructively sampled in five tropical countries (101 trees > 100 cm in diameter) and an original data set of 130 forest plots (1 ha) from central Africa to quantify the prediction error of biomass allometric models at the individual and plot levels when explicitly taking crown mass variations into account or not doing so. We first showed that the proportion of crown to total tree aboveground biomass is highly variable among trees, ranging from 3 to 88 %. This proportion was constant on average for trees < 10 Mg (mean of 34 %) but, above this threshold, increased sharply with tree mass and exceeded 50 % on average for trees  ≥  45 Mg. This increase coincided with a progressive deviation between the pantropical biomass model estimations and actual tree mass. Taking a crown mass proxy into account in a newly developed model consistently removed the bias observed for large trees (> 1 Mg) and reduced the range of plot-level error (in %) from [−23; 16] to [0; 10]. The disproportionally higher allocation of large trees to crown mass may thus explain the bias observed recently in the reference pantropical model. This bias leads to far-from-negligible, but often overlooked, systematic errors at the plot level and may be easily corrected by taking a crown mass proxy for the largest trees in a stand into account, thus suggesting that the accuracy of forest carbon estimates can be significantly improved at a minimal cost.


Author(s):  
Rajesh Bahadur Thapa ◽  
Manabu Watanabe ◽  
Masanobu Shimada ◽  
Takeshi Motohka

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Leonardo Alves White ◽  
Daniela Lima do Nascimento ◽  
Túlio Vinicius Paes Dantas ◽  
Adauto de Souza Ribeiro

2011 ◽  
Vol 261 (3) ◽  
pp. 703-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Omeja ◽  
Colin A. Chapman ◽  
Joseph Obua ◽  
Jeremiah S. Lwanga ◽  
Aerin L. Jacob ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Alastair Brown

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wannes Hubau ◽  
Simon L. Lewis ◽  
Oliver L. Phillips ◽  
Hans Beeckman ◽  

&lt;p&gt;Structurally intact tropical forests sequestered ~1 Pg C yr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; over the 1990s and early 2000s, equivalent to ~15% of fossil fuel emissions. Climate-driven vegetation models typically predict that this carbon sink will continue for the remainder of the 21&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt; century. However, recent plot inventories from Amazonia show a declining rate of carbon sequestration, potentially signaling an imminent end to the sink. Here we assess whether the African tropical forest sink is also declining.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Records from 244 multi-census plots across 11 countries reveal that the African tropical forest sink in aboveground live biomass has been stable for three decades, at 0.66 Mg C ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; yr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, from 1985-2015 (95% CI, 0.53-0.79). Thus, the carbon sink responses of Earth&amp;#8217;s two largest expanses of tropical forest have diverged over recent decades. A statistical model including CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, temperature, drought, and forest dynamics can account for the trends. Despite the past stability of the African carbon sink, our data and model show that very recently the sink has begun decreasing, and that it will continue to decline in the future.&amp;#160; This implies that the intact tropical forest carbon sink on both continents is set to end decades sooner than even the most extreme vegetation model estimates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Published independent observations of inter-hemispheric atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentration indicate increasing carbon uptake into the Northern hemisphere landmass, offsetting a weakening of the tropical forest sink, which reinforces our conclusion that the intact tropical forest carbon sink has already saturated. Nevertheless, continued on-the-ground monitoring of the world&amp;#8217;s remaining intact tropical forests will be required to test our prediction that the intact tropical forest carbon sink will continue to decline. Our findings were recently published in Nature (March 2020) and have important policy implications: given tropical forests are likely to sequester less carbon in the future than Earth System Models predict, an earlier date to reach net zero anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions will be required to meet any given commitment to limit the global heating of Earth.&lt;/p&gt;


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document