Image analytic algorithms for automated cell segmentation quality control

Author(s):  
Yousef Al-Kofahi ◽  
Ginty Fiona
2002 ◽  
Vol 24 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 101-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Wählby ◽  
Joakim Lindblad ◽  
Mikael Vondrus ◽  
Ewert Bengtsson ◽  
Lennart Björkesten

Automatic cell segmentation has various applications in cytometry, and while the nucleus is often very distinct and easy to identify, the cytoplasm provides a lot more challenge. A new combination of image analysis algorithms for segmentation of cells imaged by fluorescence microscopy is presented. The algorithm consists of an image pre‐processing step, a general segmentation and merging step followed by a segmentation quality measurement. The quality measurement consists of a statistical analysis of a number of shape descriptive features. Objects that have features that differ to that of correctly segmented single cells can be further processed by a splitting step. By statistical analysis we therefore get a feedback system for separation of clustered cells. After the segmentation is completed, the quality of the final segmentation is evaluated. By training the algorithm on a representative set of training images, the algorithm is made fully automatic for subsequent images created under similar conditions. Automatic cytoplasm segmentation was tested on CHO‐cells stained with calcein. The fully automatic method showed between 89% and 97% correct segmentation as compared to manual segmentation.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Brinker ◽  
Annika Fredrikson ◽  
Xiaofan Zhang ◽  
Richard Sourvenir ◽  
Shaoting Zhang

NeuroImage ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 365-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anisha Keshavan ◽  
Esha Datta ◽  
Ian M. McDonough ◽  
Christopher R. Madan ◽  
Kesshi Jordan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sebastian Nowak ◽  
Maike Theis ◽  
Barbara D. Wichtmann ◽  
Anton Faron ◽  
Matthias F. Froelich ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To develop a pipeline for automated body composition analysis and skeletal muscle assessment with integrated quality control for large-scale application in opportunistic imaging. Methods First, a convolutional neural network for extraction of a single slice at the L3/L4 lumbar level was developed on CT scans of 240 patients applying the nnU-Net framework. Second, a 2D competitive dense fully convolutional U-Net for segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT, SAT), skeletal muscle (SM), and subsequent determination of fatty muscle fraction (FMF) was developed on single CT slices of 1143 patients. For both steps, automated quality control was integrated by a logistic regression model classifying the presence of L3/L4 and a linear regression model predicting the segmentation quality in terms of Dice score. To evaluate the performance of the entire pipeline end-to-end, body composition metrics, and FMF were compared to manual analyses including 364 patients from two centers. Results Excellent results were observed for slice extraction (z-deviation = 2.46 ± 6.20 mm) and segmentation (Dice score for SM = 0.95 ± 0.04, VAT = 0.98 ± 0.02, SAT = 0.97 ± 0.04) on the dual-center test set excluding cases with artifacts due to metallic implants. No data were excluded for end-to-end performance analyses. With a restrictive setting of the integrated segmentation quality control, 39 of 364 patients were excluded containing 8 cases with metallic implants. This setting ensured a high agreement between manual and fully automated analyses with mean relative area deviations of ΔSM = 3.3 ± 4.1%, ΔVAT = 3.0 ± 4.7%, ΔSAT = 2.7 ± 4.3%, and ΔFMF = 4.3 ± 4.4%. Conclusions This study presents an end-to-end automated deep learning pipeline for large-scale opportunistic assessment of body composition metrics and sarcopenia biomarkers in clinical routine. Key Points • Body composition metrics and skeletal muscle quality can be opportunistically determined from routine abdominal CT scans. • A pipeline consisting of two convolutional neural networks allows an end-to-end automated analysis. • Machine-learning-based quality control ensures high agreement between manual and automatic analysis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoran Chen ◽  
Robert F. Murphy

AbstractCell segmentation is a cornerstone of many bioimage informatics studies. Inaccurate segmentation introduces computational error in downstream cellular analysis. Evaluating the segmentation results is thus a necessary step for developing the segmentation methods as well as choosing the most appropriate one for a certain kind of tissue or image. The evaluation process has typically involved comparison of segmentations to those generated by humans, which can be expensive and subject to unknown bias. We present here an approach that seeks to evaluate cell segmentation methods without relying upon comparison to results from humans. For this, we defined a number of segmentation quality metrics that can be applied to multichannel fluorescence images. We calculated these metrics for 11 previously-described segmentation methods applied to datasets from 5 multiplexed microscope modalities covering 5 tissues. Using principal component analysis to combine the metrics we defined an overall cell segmentation quality score and ranked the segmentation methods. A Reproducible Research Archive containing all data and code will be made available upon publication at http://hubmap.scs.cmu.edu.


2003 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W McKenna ◽  
Terry F Pechacek ◽  
Donna F Stroup

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document