Vector hysteresis models in comparison to the anhysteretic magnetization model

Author(s):  
Xiao Xiao ◽  
Fabian Muller ◽  
Gregor Bavendiek ◽  
Kay Hameyer
2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (17) ◽  
pp. 172510 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Raghunathan ◽  
Y. Melikhov ◽  
J. E. Snyder ◽  
D. C. Jiles

2004 ◽  
Vol 272-276 ◽  
pp. 1526-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.L. Brandl ◽  
J.C. Denardin ◽  
L.M. Socolovsky ◽  
M. Knobel ◽  
P. Allia

2005 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. 10E504
Author(s):  
Jozef Kwiczala ◽  
Bogusław Kasperczyk

2000 ◽  
Vol 275 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 168-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henk M.J Boots ◽  
Louis Sander ◽  
Kees M Schep

Materials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Nowicki

This article is concerned with the methods for experimentally determining the Anhysteretic Magnetization curve for soft magnetic materials. A new method based on the modern hysteresisgraph system is presented. Known modern and traditional methods based on fluxmeters are presented as well. The experimental results obtained with the described methods for isotropic Mn–Zn ferrite are compared. Lastly, results of validation on NANOPERM® nanocrystalline material are detailed and show negligible hysteresis. The new method allows for accurate Anhysteretic Magnetization curve measurement without software or hardware modifications of standard, commercially available hysteresisgraph systems. The speed and accuracy of the results are improved in comparison with other methods.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 763-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangming Xue ◽  
Peilin Zhang ◽  
Zhongbo He ◽  
Dongwei Li ◽  
Zhaoshu Yang ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Jiles-Atherton (J-A) model is a commonly used physics-based model in describing the hysteresis characteristics of ferromagnetic materials. However, citations and interpretation of this model in literature have been non-uniform. Solution methods for solving numerically this model has not been studied adequately. In this paper, through analyzing the mathematical properties of equations and the physical mechanism of energy conservation, we point out some unreasonable descriptions of this model and develop a relatively more accurate, modified J-A model together with its numerical solution method. Our method employs a fixed point method to compute anhysteretic magnetization. We obtain the susceptibility value of the anhysteretic magnetization analytically and apply the 4th order Runge-Kutta method to the solution of total magnetization. Computational errors are estimated and then precisions of the solving method in describing various materials are verified. At last, through analyzing the effects of the accelerating method, iterative error and step size on the computational errors, we optimize the numerical method to achieve the effects of high precision and short computing time. From analysis, we determine the range of best values of some key parameters for fast and accurate computation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document