Continuous Prediction of Leg Kinematics During Ambulation using Peripheral Sensing of Muscle Activity and Morphology

Author(s):  
Kaitlin G. Rabe ◽  
Nicholas P. Fey
2017 ◽  
Vol 284 (1868) ◽  
pp. 20171755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris J. Dallmann ◽  
Thierry Hoinville ◽  
Volker Dürr ◽  
Josef Schmitz

Animals rely on an adaptive coordination of legs during walking. However, which specific mechanisms underlie coordination during natural locomotion remains largely unknown. One hypothesis is that legs can be coordinated mechanically based on a transfer of body load from one leg to another. To test this hypothesis, we simultaneously recorded leg kinematics, ground reaction forces and muscle activity in freely walking stick insects ( Carausius morosus ). Based on torque calculations, we show that load sensors (campaniform sensilla) at the proximal leg joints are well suited to encode the unloading of the leg in individual steps. The unloading coincides with a switch from stance to swing muscle activity, consistent with a load reflex promoting the stance-to-swing transition. Moreover, a mechanical simulation reveals that the unloading can be ascribed to the loading of a specific neighbouring leg, making it exploitable for inter-leg coordination. We propose that mechanically mediated load-based coordination is used across insects analogously to mammals.


2008 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Joo Lee ◽  
Joseph Hidler

The goal of this study was to compare treadmill walking with overground walking in healthy subjects with no known gait disorders. Nineteen subjects were tested, where each subject walked on a split-belt instrumented treadmill as well as over a smooth, flat surface. Comparisons between walking conditions were made for temporal gait parameters such as step length and cadence, leg kinematics, joint moments and powers, and muscle activity. Overall, very few differences were found in temporal gait parameters or leg kinematics between treadmill and overground walking. Conversely, sagittal plane joint moments were found to be quite different, where during treadmill walking trials, subjects demonstrated less dorsiflexor moments, less knee extensor moments, and greater hip extensor moments. Joint powers in the sagittal plane were found to be similar at the ankle but quite different at the knee and hip joints. Differences in muscle activity were observed between the two walking modalities, particularly in the tibialis anterior throughout stance, and in the hamstrings, vastus medialis and adductor longus during swing. While differences were observed in muscle activation patterns, joint moments and joint powers between the two walking modalities, the overall patterns in these behaviors were quite similar. From a therapeutic perspective, this suggests that training individuals with neurological injuries on a treadmill appears to be justified.


2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 1681-1695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Rosenbaum ◽  
Anne Wosnitza ◽  
Ansgar Büschges ◽  
Matthias Gruhn

Understanding how animals control locomotion in different behaviors requires understanding both the kinematics of leg movements and the neural activity underlying these movements. Stick insect leg kinematics differ in forward and backward walking. Describing leg muscle activity in these behaviors is a first step toward understanding the neuronal basis for these differences. We report here the phasing of EMG activities and latencies of first spikes relative to precise electrical measurements of middle leg tarsus touchdown and liftoff of three pairs ( protractor/retractor coxae, levator/depressor trochanteris, extensor/flexor tibiae) of stick insect middle leg antagonistic muscles that play central roles in generating leg movements during forward and backward straight walking. Forward walking stance phase muscle (depressor, flexor, and retractor) activities were tightly coupled to touchdown, beginning on average 93 ms prior to and 9 and 35 ms after touchdown, respectively. Forward walking swing phase muscle (levator, extensor, and protractor) activities were less tightly coupled to liftoff, beginning on average 100, 67, and 37 ms before liftoff, respectively. In backward walking the protractor/retractor muscles reversed their phasing compared with forward walking, with the retractor being active during swing and the protractor during stance. Comparison of intact animal and reduced two- and one-middle-leg preparations during forward straight walking showed only small alterations in overall EMG activity but changes in first spike latencies in most muscles. Changing body height, most likely due to changes in leg joint loading, altered the intensity, but not the timing, of depressor muscle activity.


2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-96
Author(s):  
Tiina Ritvanen ◽  
Reijo Koskelo ◽  
Osmo H„nninen

Abstract This study follows muscle activity in three different learning sessions (computer, language laboratory, and normal classroom) while students were studying foreign languages. Myoelectric activity was measured in 21 high school students (10 girls, 11 boys, age range 17-20 years) by surface electromyography (sEMG) from the upper trapezius and frontalis muscles during three 45-min sessions. Root mean square (RMS) average from both investigated muscles was calculated. The EMG activity was highest in both muscle groups in the computer-aided session and lowest in the language laboratory. The girls had higher EMG activity in both investigated muscle groups in all three learning situations. The measured blood pressure was highest at the beginning of the sessions, decreased within 10 min, but increased again toward the end of the sessions. Our results indicate that the use of a computer as a teaching-aid evokes more constant muscle activity than the traditional learning situations. Since muscle tension can have adverse health consequences, more research is needed to determine optimal classroom conditions, especially when technical aids are used in teaching.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Rashedi ◽  
Bochen Jia ◽  
Maury A. Nussbaum ◽  
Thurmon E. Lockhart

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi F. Glasscock ◽  
Gary A. Mirka ◽  
Carolyn M. Sommerich ◽  
Katherine W. Klein

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Porter ◽  
Sean Gallagher ◽  
Carrie Reinholtz ◽  
Janet Torma-Krajewski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document