scholarly journals PrESTO: A Peer Review and Peer Assessment System with Incentives for High Quality Learning

Author(s):  
Pieter Bots ◽  
C. Els van Daalen ◽  
Sofia Dopper ◽  
Joosje Westink
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet EMIN KORTAK

This research aimed at designing and improving the web-based integrated peer and self- assessment. WesPASS (web-based peer-assessment system), developed in this research, allows students to assess their own or their peers’ performance and project assignments and to report about the result of these assessments so that they correct their assignments. This study employed design-based research. The participants included 102 fourth grade primary school students and their 4 teachers from 2 state and 2 private primary schools in Ankara, Kecioren (Turkey) who employed the system and were engaged in a questionnaire survey to assess its quality. The findings were analyzed through quantitative data analysis. The findings revealed that the system can be used by elementary school students for peer and self-assessment system. The participants stated that WesPASS is simple and user-friendly, and it accelerates the assessment process by employing information technology and allows to share opinions 


2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Phillips

ABSTRACTThis paper describes an online system that facilitates peer assessment of students' course work and then uses data from individual case writing assignments in introductory financial accounting to empirically examine associations between peer assessment and case writing performance. Through this description and empirical analysis, the paper addresses the following questions: (1) Why use peer assessment? (2) How does online peer assessment work? (3) Is student peer assessment reliable? (4) What do students think of peer assessment? (5) Does student peer assessment contribute to academic performance? Three key findings from this study are that students at the sophomore level were able to generate reasonably reliable feedback for peers, they valued the experiences involved in providing peer feedback, and giving quality feedback had a more significant and enduring impact on students' accounting case analyses than did receiving quality feedback, after controlling for differences in accounting knowledge and case writing skills.


Logistics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Logistics maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Brain Sciences maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Dairy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-72
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Dairy maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Cosmetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Cosmetics maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Geosciences maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-80
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Clean Technologies maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Life maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Games ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Games maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document