Fault Detection and Diagnosis in IP-Based Mission Critical Industrial Process Control Networks

2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 172-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.J. Won ◽  
Mi-Jung Choi ◽  
J.W.-K. Hong ◽  
Myung-Sup Kim ◽  
Hwawon Hwang ◽  
...  
Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 227
Author(s):  
Jinlin Zhu ◽  
Muyun Jiang ◽  
Zhong Liu

This work considers industrial process monitoring using a variational autoencoder (VAE). As a powerful deep generative model, the variational autoencoder and its variants have become popular for process monitoring. However, its monitoring ability, especially its fault diagnosis ability, has not been well investigated. In this paper, the process modeling and monitoring capabilities of several VAE variants are comprehensively studied. First, fault detection schemes are defined in three distinct ways, considering latent, residual, and the combined domains. Afterwards, to conduct the fault diagnosis, we first define the deep contribution plot, and then a deep reconstruction-based contribution diagram is proposed for deep domains under the fault propagation mechanism. In a case study, the performance of the process monitoring capability of four deep VAE models, namely, the static VAE model, the dynamic VAE model, and the recurrent VAE models (LSTM-VAE and GRU-VAE), has been comparatively evaluated on the industrial benchmark Tennessee Eastman process. Results show that recurrent VAEs with a deep reconstruction-based diagnosis mechanism are recommended for industrial process monitoring tasks.


2012 ◽  
Vol 591-593 ◽  
pp. 2108-2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhang Ming He ◽  
Hai Yin Zhou ◽  
Jiong Qi Wang ◽  
Yuan Yuan Jiao

Detection and diagnosis of unanticipated fault has inevitably become a critical issue for PHM (Prognostics and Health Management), especially in the fields of robot, spacecraft and industrial system. It is difficult to overcome this problem since there is lack of history information, prior knowledge and dealing strategy for unanticipated fault. In this paper, a general processing model for unanticipated fault detection and diagnosis is constructed, then, a detection method, named OCPCA (One-class Principal Component Analysis), is proposed. Every OCPCA detector is trained by data from single pattern, and the testing task is to determine whether the testing data is from the very pattern. If the unanticipated fault data is rejected by all OCPCA detectors, then the detection task is accomplished. TEP (Tennessee-Eastman Process), a widely used simulated system based on an actual industrial process, is used to verify the detection of unanticipated fault. The results demonstrate the validity of the proposed model and method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document