Traded Control of Human-Machine Systems for Sequential Decision-Making Based on Reinforcement Learning

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Qianqian Zhang ◽  
Yu Kang ◽  
Yun-Bo Zhao ◽  
Pengfei Li ◽  
Shiyi You
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Sequential Decision Making ◽  
Sequential Decision ◽  
Machine Systems

scholarly journals Optimal Policies for Quantum Markov Decision Processes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Sheng Ying ◽  
Yuan Feng ◽  
Sheng-Gang Ying
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Quantum Systems ◽  
Sequential Decision Making ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Sequential Decision ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Optimal Policies ◽  
Markov Decision ◽  
Programming Algorithms

AbstractMarkov decision process (MDP) offers a general framework for modelling sequential decision making where outcomes are random. In particular, it serves as a mathematical framework for reinforcement learning. This paper introduces an extension of MDP, namely quantum MDP (qMDP), that can serve as a mathematical model of decision making about quantum systems. We develop dynamic programming algorithms for policy evaluation and finding optimal policies for qMDPs in the case of finite-horizon. The results obtained in this paper provide some useful mathematical tools for reinforcement learning techniques applied to the quantum world.

scholarly journals Strategic Tasks for Explainable Reinforcement Learning

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 10007-10008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rey Pocius ◽  
Lawrence Neal ◽  
Alan Fern
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Strategic Decision ◽  
Strategic Decision Making ◽  
Sequential Decision Making ◽  
Sequential Decision ◽  
Level Control ◽  
Mini Games ◽  
High Level

Commonly used sequential decision making tasks such as the games in the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE) provide rich observation spaces suitable for deep reinforcement learning. However, they consist mostly of low-level control tasks which are of limited use for the development of explainable artificial intelligence(XAI) due to the fine temporal resolution of the tasks. Many of these domains also lack built-in high level abstractions and symbols. Existing tasks that provide for both strategic decision-making and rich observation spaces are either difficult to simulate or are intractable. We provide a set of new strategic decision-making tasks specialized for the development and evaluation of explainable AI methods, built as constrained mini-games within the StarCraft II Learning Environment.

Imaginative Reinforcement Learning: Computational Principles and Neural Mechanisms

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 2103-2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Gershman ◽  
Jimmy Zhou ◽  
Cody Kommers
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Internal Model ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Sequential Decision Making ◽  
Sequential Decision ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Reinforcement Learning Model

Imagination enables us not only to transcend reality but also to learn about it. In the context of reinforcement learning, an agent can rationally update its value estimates by simulating an internal model of the environment, provided that the model is accurate. In a series of sequential decision-making experiments, we investigated the impact of imaginative simulation on subsequent decisions. We found that imagination can cause people to pursue imagined paths, even when these paths are suboptimal. This bias is systematically related to participants' optimism about how much reward they expect to receive along imagined paths; providing feedback strongly attenuates the effect. The imagination effect can be captured by a reinforcement learning model that includes a bonus added onto imagined rewards. Using fMRI, we show that a network of regions associated with valuation is predictive of the imagination effect. These results suggest that imagination, although a powerful tool for learning, is also susceptible to motivational biases.

scholarly journals Read, Watch, and Move: Reinforcement Learning for Temporally Grounding Natural Language Descriptions in Videos

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 8393-8400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongliang He ◽  
Xiang Zhao ◽  
Jizhou Huang ◽  
Fu Li ◽  
Xiao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Sliding Window ◽  
Sequential Decision Making ◽  
Sequential Decision ◽  
Boundary Information ◽  
Performance Gains ◽  
Steady Performance

The task of video grounding, which temporally localizes a natural language description in a video, plays an important role in understanding videos. Existing studies have adopted strategies of sliding window over the entire video or exhaustively ranking all possible clip-sentence pairs in a presegmented video, which inevitably suffer from exhaustively enumerated candidates. To alleviate this problem, we formulate this task as a problem of sequential decision making by learning an agent which regulates the temporal grounding boundaries progressively based on its policy. Specifically, we propose a reinforcement learning based framework improved by multi-task learning and it shows steady performance gains by considering additional supervised boundary information during training. Our proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on ActivityNet’18 DenseCaption dataset (Krishna et al. 2017) and Charades-STA dataset (Sigurdsson et al. 2016; Gao et al. 2017) while observing only 10 or less clips per video.

scholarly journals A Novel Heterogeneous Swarm Reinforcement Learning Method for Sequential Decision Making Problems

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 590-610
Author(s):  
Zohreh Akbari ◽  
Rainer Unland
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Sequential Decision Making ◽  
Multi Agent Systems ◽  
Sequential Decision ◽  
Agent Systems ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Markov Decision ◽  
Multi Agent

Sequential Decision Making Problems (SDMPs) that can be modeled as Markov Decision Processes can be solved using methods that combine Dynamic Programming (DP) and Reinforcement Learning (RL). Depending on the problem scenarios and the available Decision Makers (DMs), such RL algorithms may be designed for single-agent systems or multi-agent systems that either consist of agents with individual goals and decision making capabilities, which are influenced by other agent’s decisions, or behave as a swarm of agents that collaboratively learn a single objective. Many studies have been conducted in this area; however, when concentrating on available swarm RL algorithms, one obtains a clear view of the areas that still require attention. Most of the studies in this area focus on homogeneous swarms and so far, systems introduced as Heterogeneous Swarms (HetSs) merely include very few, i.e., two or three sub-swarms of homogeneous agents, which either, according to their capabilities, deal with a specific sub-problem of the general problem or exhibit different behaviors in order to reduce the risk of bias. This study introduces a novel approach that allows agents, which are originally designed to solve different problems and hence have higher degrees of heterogeneity, to behave as a swarm when addressing identical sub-problems. In fact, the affinity between two agents, which measures the compatibility of agents to work together towards solving a specific sub-problem, is used in designing a Heterogeneous Swarm RL (HetSRL) algorithm that allows HetSs to solve the intended SDMPs.

scholarly journals Reinforcement Learning - A Technical Introduction

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Elmar Diederichs
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Sequential Decision Making ◽  
Sequential Decision ◽  
Learning Problem ◽  
Open Problems ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Directed Learning ◽  
Abstract Class ◽  
Algorithmic Approaches

Reinforcement learning provides a cognitive science perspective to behavior and sequential decision making provided that RL-algorithms introduce a computational concept of agency to the learning problem. Hence it addresses an abstract class of problems that can be characterized as follows: An algorithm confronted with information from an unknown environment is supposed to find stepwise an optimal way to behave based only on some sparse, delayed or noisy feedback from some environment, that changes according to the algorithm's behavior. Hence reinforcement learning offers an abstraction to the problem of goal-directed learning from interaction. The paper offers an opintionated introduction in the algorithmic advantages and drawbacks of several algorithmic approaches such that one can understand recent developments and open problems in reinforcement learning.

scholarly journals Habitual control of goal selection in humans

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (45) ◽  
pp. 13817-13822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiery Cushman ◽  
Adam Morris
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Computational Efficiency ◽  
Behavioral Control ◽  
Hierarchical Architecture ◽  
Sequential Decision Making ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Sequential Decision ◽  
Goal Selection ◽  
Computationally Expensive

Humans choose actions based on both habit and planning. Habitual control is computationally frugal but adapts slowly to novel circumstances, whereas planning is computationally expensive but can adapt swiftly. Current research emphasizes the competition between habits and plans for behavioral control, yet many complex tasks instead favor their integration. We consider a hierarchical architecture that exploits the computational efficiency of habitual control to select goals while preserving the flexibility of planning to achieve those goals. We formalize this mechanism in a reinforcement learning setting, illustrate its costs and benefits, and experimentally demonstrate its spontaneous application in a sequential decision-making task.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document