scholarly journals Brain Dynamics of Spatial Reference Frame Proclivity in Active Navigation

Author(s):  
Che-Sheng Yang ◽  
Jia Liu ◽  
Avinash Kumar Singh ◽  
Kuan-Chih Huang ◽  
Chin-Teng Lin
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Che-Sheng Yang ◽  
Jia Liu ◽  
Avinash Singh ◽  
Kuan-Chih Huang ◽  
Chin-Teng Lin

Recent research into navigation strategy of different spatial reference frame proclivities (RFPs) has revealed that the parietal cortex plays an important role in processing allocentric information to provide a translation function between egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frames. However, most studies merely focused on a passive experimental environment, which is not truly representative of our daily spatial learning/navigation tasks. This study investigated the factor associated with brain dynamics that causes people to switch their preferred spatial strategy in different environments in virtual reality (VR) based active navigation task to bridge the gap. High-resolution electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded to monitor spectral perturbations on transitions between egocentric and allocentric frames during a path integration task. Our brain dynamics results showed navigation involved areas including the parietal cortex with modulation in the alpha band, the occipital cortex with beta and low gamma band perturbations, and the frontal cortex with theta perturbation. Differences were found between two different turning-angle paths in the alpha band in parietal cluster event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs). In small turning-angle paths, allocentric participants showed stronger alpha desynchronization than egocentric participants; in large turning-angle paths, participants for two reference frames had a smaller difference in the alpha frequency band. Behavior results of homing errors also corresponded to brain dynamic results, indicating that a larger angle path caused the allocentric to have a higher tendency to become egocentric navigators in the active navigation environment.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Mills ◽  
Stefan Van Der Stigchel ◽  
Andrew Hollingworth ◽  
Michael D. Dodd

1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Flanders ◽  
John F. Soechting

In reaching and grasping movements, information about object location and object orientation is used to specify the appropriate proximal arm posture and the appropriate positions for the wrist and fingers. Since object orientation is ideally defined in a frame of reference fixed in space, this study tested whether the neural control of hand orientation is also best described as being in this spatial reference frame. With the proximal arm in various postures, human subjects used a handheld rod to approximate verbally defined spatial orientations. Subjects did quite well at indicating spatial vertical and spatial horizontal but made consistent errors in estimating 45° spatial slants. The errors were related to the proximal arm posture in a way that indicated that oblique hand orientations may be specified as a compromise between a reference frame fixed in space and a reference frame fixed to the arm. In another experiment, where subjects were explicitly requested to use a reference frame fixed to the arm, the performance was consistently biased toward a spatial reference frame. The results suggest that reaching and grasping movements may be implemented as an amalgam of two frames of reference, both neurally and behaviorally.


Cognition ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhong V. Jiang ◽  
Khena M. Swallow

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Aijun WANG ◽  
Lu SHEN ◽  
Yingying CHI ◽  
Xiaole LIU ◽  
Qi CHEN ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 961
Author(s):  
Ying Fang ◽  
Shiyi Li ◽  
Nadia Wong ◽  
Shahan Tariq ◽  
Hanzhuang Zhu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document