Avoiding deleterious effects of exoskeletal assistance in people with Stiff-Knee Gait after stroke

Author(s):  
Tunc Akbas ◽  
Richard R. Neptune ◽  
James Sulzer
Keyword(s):  
The Knee ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Tilkeridis ◽  
Dimitrios Diamantidis ◽  
Anthimos Keskinis ◽  
Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos ◽  
Christos Chatzipapas ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
1919 ◽  
Vol 2 (3068) ◽  
pp. 509-509
Author(s):  
Chas. Forbes
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (15) ◽  
pp. 2658-2661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Andrés Gatti ◽  
Orestes Freixes ◽  
Sergio Anibal Fernández ◽  
Maria Elisa Rivas ◽  
Marcos Crespo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Seobin Choi ◽  
Jieon Lee ◽  
Gwanseob Shin

Stiff-knee, which indicates reduced range of knee flexion, may decrease gait stability. Although it is closely related to an increase in fall risk, the effect of limited knee flexion on the balance capacity during walking has not been well studied. This study aimed at examining how walking with limited knee flexion would influence the center of pressure (COP) trajectory and spatiotemporal gait parameters. Sixteen healthy young participants conducted four different walking conditions: normal walking and walking with limited knee flexion of their left knee up to 40 and 20 degrees, respectively. Results show that the participants walked significantly (p<0.05) slower with shorter stride length, wider step width, less cadence, and decreased stance phase when walking with limited knee flexion, compared to normal walking. The increase in the asymmetry and variability of the COP was also observed. It indicates that limited knee flexion during walking might affect the dynamic balance.


2020 ◽  
pp. 441-449
Author(s):  
R Debarge ◽  
P Archbold ◽  
P Neyret ◽  
C Butcher

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e12
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar ◽  
Anikait Ghosh Kadamb ◽  
Krish Ghosh Kadamb

BackgroundComparative studies of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid show variable results. PurposeA review was conducted to understand the current role of PRP and its efficacy versus hyaluronic acid in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint. MethodsOut of 170 identified studies, 14 studies involving 1575 patients with 637 males and 938 females were selected based on PRISMA flow chart guidelines and were analyzed for the study. ResultsA standard PRP regimen consisting of 2–3 intra-articular injections (IA) of 4–6 mL of leucocyte poor PRP at 1–2 weekly intervals provides a better result than HA during the first 3–6 months, and which may continue up to one year. PRP and HA may have synergistic effect; pain and swelling are the two most com-mon complications with PRP, the incidence is more with leucocyte rich PRP (LP-PRP) and intra-osseous PRP treatment.ConclusionPRP provides hope and is more effective than hyaluronic acid in pain relief and improving the quality of life in mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, hype, that is effective in all, irrespective of grades of OA, mal-aligned or stiff knee, ligamentous laxity, and can avoid joint replacement is a big hindrance in establishing it as a preferred treatment in OA knee. The author follows the above-mentioned PRP regimen; and recommends to combine leucocyte poor PRP with HA for IA injections & with LP-PRP injections along with the two most common painful points (medial collateral ligament, pesanisernius) in a highly painful OA knee. PRP may not address extra-articular causes of knee pain (mal-alignment, muscle wasting, tendinosis), should be corrected for optimum outcome. Contact sports, running, exercises putting pressure on knee and NSAID should be avoided during PRP treatment. Also, more randomized controlled trials are required to further standardize the PRP preparation, administration, injection interval & proper documentation of efficacy and complications in the regenerative registry.


Author(s):  
Robert M. Kay ◽  
Kristan Pierz ◽  
James McCarthy ◽  
H. Kerr Graham ◽  
Henry Chambers ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was for an international panel of experts to establish consensus indications for distal rectus femoris surgery in children with cerebral palsy (CP) using a modified Delphi method. Methods The panel used a five-level Likert scale to record agreement or disagreement with 33 statements regarding distal rectus femoris surgery. The panel responded to statements regarding general characteristics, clinical indications, computerized gait data, intraoperative techniques and outcome measures. Consensus was defined as at least 80% of responses being in the highest or lowest two of the five Likert ratings, and general agreement as 60% to 79% falling into the highest or lowest two ratings. There was no agreement if neither threshold was reached. Results Consensus or general agreement was reached for 17 of 33 statements (52%). There was general consensus that distal rectus femoris surgery is better for stiff knee gait than is proximal rectus femoris release. There was no consensus about whether the results of distal rectus femoris release were comparable to those following distal rectus femoris transfer. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level was an important factor for the panel, with the best outcomes expected in children functioning at GMFCS levels I and II. The panel also reached consensus that they do distal rectus femoris surgery less frequently than earlier in their careers, in large part reflecting the narrowing of indications for this surgery over the last decade. Conclusion This study can help paediatric orthopaedic surgeons optimize decision-making for, and outcomes of, distal rectus femoris surgery in children with CP. Level of evidence V


2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. -N. Argenson ◽  
H. Vinel ◽  
J. -M. Aubaniac

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document