Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in the emergency department

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Vassiliadis ◽  
Alex Tzannes ◽  
Kerry Hitos ◽  
Jessica Brimble ◽  
Toby Fogg
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Video Laryngoscope ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscopy

scholarly journals A Comparison of the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope to the Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Intubation in the Emergency Department

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Sakles ◽  
Jarrod Mosier ◽  
Stephen Chiu ◽  
Mari Cosentino ◽  
Leah Kalin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Video Laryngoscope ◽  
Direct Laryngoscope

scholarly journals C-MAC Video Laryngoscope versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong Chul Min ◽  
Jong Eun Park ◽  
Gun Tak Lee ◽  
Tae Rim Kim ◽  
Hee Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Direct Laryngoscopy ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Video Laryngoscope ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression ◽  
Total N ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and objectives: To compare the first pass success (FPS) rate of the C-MAC video laryngoscope (C-MAC) and conventional Macintosh-type direct laryngoscopy (DL) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the emergency department (ED). Materials and Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective study conducted from April 2014 to July 2018. Patients were categorized into either the C-MAC or DL group, according to the device used on the first endotracheal intubation (ETI) attempt. The primary outcome was the FPS rate. A multiple logistic regression model was developed to identify factors related to the FPS. Results: A total of 573 ETIs were performed. Of the eligible cases, 263 and 310 patients were assigned to the C-MAC and DL group, respectively. The overall FPS rate was 75% (n = 431/573). The FPS rate was higher in the C-MAC group than in the DL group, but there was no statistically significant difference (total n = 431, 79% compared to 72%, p = 0.075). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the C-MAC use had higher FPS rate (adjusted odds ratio: 1.80; 95% CI, 1.17–2.77; p = 0.007) than that of the DL use. Conclusions: The C-MAC use on the first ETI attempt during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department had a higher FPS rate than that of the DL use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document