scholarly journals Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) as a tool for continuing medical education on opioid use disorder and comorbidities

Addiction ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Agley ◽  
Zachary W. Adams ◽  
Leslie A. Hulvershorn
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Le Hong Nhung ◽  
Vu Duy Kien ◽  
Nguyen Phuong Lan ◽  
Pham Viet Cuong ◽  
Pham Quoc Thanh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model is considered a platform for academic medical centers to expand their healthcare workforce capacity to medically underserved populations. It has been known as an effective solution of continuing medical education (CME) for healthcare workers that used a hub-and-spoke model to leverage knowledge from specialists to primary healthcare providers in different regions. In this study, we aim to explore the views of healthcare providers and hospital leaders regarding the feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of Project ECHO for pediatricians. Methods This qualitative study was conducted at the Vietnam National Children’s Hospital and its satellite hospitals from July to December 2020. We conducted 39 in-depth interviews with hospital managers and healthcare providers who participated in online Project ECHO courses. A thematic analysis approach was performed to extract the qualitative data from in-depth interviews. Results Project ECHO shows high feasibility when healthcare providers find motivated to improve their professional knowledge. Besides, they realized the advantages of saving time and money with online training. Although the courses had been covered fully by the Ministry of Health’s fund, the participants said they could pay fees or be supported by the hospital’s fund. In particular, the expectation of attaining the CME-credited certificates after completing the course also contributes to the sustainability of the program. Project ECHO’s online courses should be improved if the session was better monitored with suitable time arrangements. Conclusions Project ECHO model is highly feasible, acceptable, and sustainable as it brings great benefits to the healthcare providers, and is appropriate with the policy theme of continuing medical education of the Ministry of Health. We recommend that further studies should be conducted to assess the impact of the ECHO program, especially for patient and community outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly Ann Russell ◽  
Brian Smith ◽  
Mechelle Sanders ◽  
Elizabeth Loomis

Objective: Substance use disorders remain highly stigmatized. Access to medications for opioid use disorder is poor. There are many barriers to expanding access including stigma and lack of medical education about substance use disorders. We enriched the existing, federally required, training for clinicians to prescribe buprenorphine with a biopsychosocial focus in order to decrease stigma and expand access to medications for opioid use disorder.Methods: We trained a family medicine team to deliver an enriched version of the existing buprenorphine waiver curriculum. The waiver training was integrated into the curriculum for all University of Rochester physician and nurse practitioner family medicine residents and also offered to University of Rochester residents and faculty in other disciplines and regionally. We used the Brief Substance Abuse Attitudes Survey to collect baseline and post-training data.Outcomes: 140 training participants completed attitude surveys. The overall attitude score increased significantly from pre to post-training. Additionally, significant changes were observed in non-moralism from pre-training (M = 20.07) to post-training (M = 20.98, p < 0.001); treatment optimism from pre-training (M = 21.56) to post-training (M = 22.33, p < 0.001); and treatment interventions from pre-training (M = 31.03) to post-training (M = 32.10, p < 0.001).Conclusion: Increasing medical education around Opioid Use Disorder using a Family Medicine trained team with a biopsychosocial focus can improve provider attitudes around substance use disorders. Enriching training with cases may improve treatment optimism and may help overcome the documented barriers to prescribing medications for opioid use disorder and increase access for patients to lifesaving treatments.


CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S114
Author(s):  
D. Wiercigroch ◽  
P. Hoyeck ◽  
H. Sheikh ◽  
J. Hulme

Introduction: The opioid crisis persists, and in the context of this urgency and new practice guidelines, the practice of buprenorphine (BUP) prescription is expanding across Canadian emergency departments (EDs). The objective of this study was to identify current knowledge, attitudes and behaviours to managing opioid use disorder (OUD) in the ED, including barriers and facilitators to prescribing BUP. Methods: Forty ED staff physicians were randomly invited to participate from an urban Toronto ED which recently received continuing medical education in addictions, and whose hospital established an addictions follow-up clinic. Individual semi-structured interviews with the 19 physicians who self-selected to participate were grounded in phenomenology, allowing for in-depth accounts of participants’ lived experience and viewpoints on their role in addressing OUD. Thematic analysis was achieved through multiple readings; themes were coded using Dedoose software by two researchers. Themes were further organized as facilitators, barriers, and proposed solutions. Results: Opioid withdrawal management in the ED varied significantly between these practitioners in the same practice group. Facilitators to treating withdrawal and initiating BUP in the ED were rooted in three contributors to physician empowerment: knowledge about OUD and BUP, positive patient and provider experience with substitution therapy in the past, and exposure to physician champions to guide their practice. Systems-level facilitators included timely access to follow-up care and an available order set. Barriers included provider inexperience: missing subtle presentations of withdrawal, lacking feedback on treatment effectiveness, and reported uncertainty about the protocol from nursing staff. The ED environment also limits time to counsel effectively and discourages taking up a bed both to wait for withdrawal onset and for BUP induction. Other barriers were concerns about precipitating withdrawal, prescribing a chronic medication in acute care, and patient attitudes. Conclusion: This is the first study describing barriers and facilitators to addressing OUD and prescribing BUP in the ED. These findings suggest a role for home induction, involvement of allied health professionals in BUP counseling, and heightened continuing medical education. Results will inform departmental efforts across Canada to implement BUP prescribing as standard of care for patients in opioid withdrawal.


2000 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne F. Larrabee ◽  
Arlen D. Meyers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document