Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Anatomy of the Ovine Lumbar Spine

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Nisolle ◽  
X. Q. Wang ◽  
M. Squélart ◽  
F. Hontoir ◽  
N. Kirschvink ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Keshtkaran ◽  
Mohammad Bagheri ◽  
Rahim Ostovar ◽  
Hedayat Salari ◽  
Majid Reza Farrokhi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Rumyantseva ◽  
Sh. Erdes ◽  
A. V. Smirnov

Investigation of the evolution of early axial spondylitis (axSP) is now of great importance especially before the appearance of reliable radiological signs of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Of particular interest is the assessment of inflammatory and post-inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joints (SJ) and in the spine using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).The aimof the study was to analyze inflammatory foci in bone according to MRI in the area of SJ and lumbar spine (LS) in patients with early axSP.Material and methods.The study involved the patients of the Moscow cohort CORSAIR (Early Spondyloarthritis Cohort), which was formed in V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology. Low field MRI of SJ and LS was carried out in all patients at inclusion in the study in the T1 and STIR modes.Results and discussion.SJ MRI most often (34.1%) revealed combined foci of inflammation (active and chronic sacroiliitis – SI), 32.9% of patients showed signs of only chronic, rarely – only active SI (19.5%). In a few cases, MRI showed inflammatory changes in LS, which were regarded as active and chronic spondylitis. In patients with a disease duration of up to 1 year, signs of active SI were more common according to MRI than in patients with a longer duration of the disease (30.0 and 14.4%, respectively; p<0.05). All active foci of inflammation (with or without signs of chronic SI) were significantly more frequently detected in patients with AS than in non-radiological axSP (NR-axSP; 61.6% and 44.2%, respectively; p<0.05). The overall incidence of chronic spondylitis (in combination with or without active spondylitis) in patients with AS was higher than in NR-axSP(13.9% and 5.8%, respectively; p<0.05).Conclusion.Patients with AS more often have active lesions at MRI of SJ and chronic ones at MRI of LS than patients with NR-axSP


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 742-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malwina Kaniewska ◽  
Johannes Maria de Beus ◽  
Frank Ahlhelm ◽  
Alexander Mameghani ◽  
Karim Eid ◽  
...  

Background Whole spine localizers (WS-loc) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are performed for enumeration of the vertebrae but they can be also used for the evaluation of the spine. Purpose To assess the accuracy of fracture detection using WS-locs of MRI and compare the findings with standard high-resolution short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences, and to determine whether the review of WS-locs is useful and if additional information can be gained by assessing the thoracic spine section of the WS-locs. Material and Methods A total of 298 magnetic resonance (MR) examinations of the lumbar spine with WS-locs were evaluated. Two independent readers reviewed the images. In case of fracture detection, further characterization of the fracture was performed. To assess inter-reader agreement, unweighted Cohen’s kappa with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and Phi coefficients were calculated. Results The study sample included 187 female and 111 male patients (age range = 65–94 years; median age = 75.0 years). The WS-locs detected 42 fractures of the lumbar spine and 36 of the thoracic spine. Inter-reader agreement for fracture detection in the lumbar and thoracic spine was strong (K = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78–0.95, Phi = 0.87, and K = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79–0.96, Phi = 0.88, respectively). Conclusion WS-locs from MR examinations of the lumbar spine provide a good diagnostic tool for the detection and evaluation of unsuspected vertebral fractures. WS-locs show strong inter-reader agreement for fracture detection in the thoracic and lumbar spine.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Griffith ◽  
Radhesh Krishna Lalam

AbstractWhen it comes to examining the brachial plexus, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary investigations. US is well placed for screening most extraforaminal pathologies, whereas MRI is more sensitive and accurate for specific clinical indications. For example, MRI is probably the preferred technique for assessment of trauma because it enables a thorough evaluation of both the intraspinal and extraspinal elements, although US can depict extraforaminal neural injury with a high level of accuracy. Conversely, US is probably the preferred technique for examination of neurologic amyotrophy because a more extensive involvement beyond the brachial plexus is the norm, although MRI is more sensitive than US for evaluating muscle denervation associated with this entity. With this synergy in mind, this review highlights the tips for examining the brachial plexus with US and MRI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document