Manipulation of ripening via antitranspirants in cv. Barbera (V itis vinifera  L.)

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gatti ◽  
M. Galbignani ◽  
A. Garavani ◽  
F. Bernizzoni ◽  
S. Tombesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 125949 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gatti ◽  
M. Schippa ◽  
A. Garavani ◽  
C. Squeri ◽  
T. Frioni ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Gatti ◽  
Cecilia Squeri ◽  
Alessandra Garavani ◽  
Alberto Vercesi ◽  
Paolo Dosso ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Gatti ◽  
Cecilia Squeri ◽  
Alessandra Garavani ◽  
Tommaso Frioni ◽  
Paolo Dosso ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 2303-2312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Bonfante-Fasolo ◽  
Roberto Grippiolo

During the various stages of the symbiotic association of the vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungus Glomus fasciculatus (Thaxter) Gerd, et Trappe with the roots of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Barbera, the hyphal wall undergoes marked modifications as follows: (i) a gradual thinning out, from the extraradical hyphae to the intraradical hyphae; (ii) changes in its ultrastructural architecture, in that the wall consists of stacked lamellae in both the extraradical and coiled hyphae occurring in the outer layers of the cortical parenchyma, whereas it is monostratified in the intercellular and arbuscular hyphae occurring in the inner parenchymal layers; and (iii) different responses to cytochemical reactions. The protein and polysaccharide components, though consistently present in the fungal wall at all stages, vary in their staining characteristics after the PATAg and Swift procedure and in their responses to alkali extraction, suggesting a gradual simplification of the wall components from the extraradical hyphae to the intraradical ones.


OENO One ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Poni ◽  
Fabio Bernizzoni

<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Aims</strong>: Competitiveness in modern viticulture requires that vineyard management techniques used for crop regulation, besides being economically viable, would assure stable grape composition improvement across variability of genotypes and seasons. Pre-flowering basal leaf removal has previously been shown as an effective tool in controlling yield primarily through a reduced fruit-set. This study aims to evaluate the impact of early leaf removal on the differential growth of the various berry organs (skin, flesh and seeds) as well as the constancy of such effects across season variability and their impact on final grape composition.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Methods and results</strong>: Pre-bloom defoliation (D) of the first six basal leaves on main shoots was applied to the field-grown Barbera cultivar (<em>Vitis vinifera</em> L.) from 2006 to 2008 and compared with non-defoliated (ND) controls. Over a three-year period, defoliation induced a 34% average reduction in berry number as compared to ND, which led to a notable decrease in fruit-set (-7.6 %), cluster mass (-34%) and yield per shoot (-30%). The berry mass showed a significant relationship with the year factor, as berry size in D shoots was larger, similar and smaller than ND in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. In both treatments, skin mass was closely correlated with berry mass and, within each season and berry mass category, D had relative skin mass values higher than ND. Although the effects were milder in 2007, D induced a significant increase in soluble solids, anthocyanins and phenolics, whereas total acidity was unaffected.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion</strong>: These results indicate that, regardless of final berry size, a pre-flowering defoliation favors skin development, which results in higher relative skin mass than ND vines. This effect appears to predominate over variations due to specific weather and cultural conditions along the season and leads to a marked improvement in final grape composition.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Significance and impact of study</strong>: Repeatability of results implies a strong physiological regulation of this technique and encourages extension of its use in areas where the occurrence of high cropping and large clusters with a high degree of compactness does exist. In a global warming scenario, it is also relevant that the yield decrease and the improvement in overall grape composition are not obtained at the expense of a further reduction in berry acidity.</p>


2005 ◽  
Vol 166 (3) ◽  
pp. 895-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Tassoni ◽  
Silvia Fornalè ◽  
Marina Franceschetti ◽  
Federica Musiani ◽  
Anthony J. Michael ◽  
...  

HortScience ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 154-156
Author(s):  
Michael J. Costello

Two California native perennial grasses, nodding needlegrass [Nassella cernua (Stebbins & R.M. Love) Barkworth] and California barley [Hordeum brachyantherum Nevski ssp. californicum (Covas & Stebbins) Bothmer, N. Jacobsen & Seberg], were compared with a conventional grass cover crop, ‘Blando’ brome (Bromus hordeaceus L.), as well as resident (weedy) vegetation and a clean cultivated control for effects on growth and yield of cultivated grape (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Barbera). Statistical analyses did not reveal yield differences between treatments with floor vegetation (the native grasses, ‘Blando’ brome, and resident vegetation) and clean cultivation, the cover crop treatments (the native grasses and ‘Blando brome’) and clean cultivation, nor the native grass treatments versus treatments with non-native floor vegetation (‘Blando’ brome and resident vegetation). However, there was a significant difference between the two native grasses with the average yield of nodding needlegrass 26.2% higher than that of California barley. Treatments did not differ in °Brix, berry weight, or pruning weight. At the end of the study, vine trunk diameter was 7.1% higher under the cover crop treatments than resident vegetation. Given these results, in vineyards where a neutral effect on growth or yield is desired, nodding needlegrass would be suitable as a permanent cover crop, whereas California barley would not.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document