scholarly journals Evidence and timing: The keys to good policy

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1008-1009
Author(s):  
Colette Colman
Keyword(s):  
BMJ ◽  
1948 ◽  
Vol 1 (4552) ◽  
pp. 665-665
Author(s):  
H. T. N. Merrick
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Abdul-Nasser H.R. Hikmany ◽  
Umar A. Oseni

Purpose This paper aims to examine the prospects of a dispute resolution framework for the Islamic banking industry in Tanzania under the existing legal framework. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on comparative study by drawing significant lessons from other jurisdictions, and argues that to avoid some of the initial drawbacks in the dispute resolution framework for Islamic banking transactions in more advanced jurisdictions like Malaysia and United Kingdom, it is important for Tanzania to get it right from the onset to effectively manage Islamic banking disputes. Findings The study finds that apart from the court system which provides the main avenue for Islamic finance litigation, other processes such as arbitration and mediation which are deemed to be more sustainable could also be developed for effective dispute management. Research limitations/implications The study focuses on Tanzania banking system with comparison to other jurisdictions. Practical implications An increase of Sharī’ah-compliant products in Tanzania has led to the establishment of a number of Islamic banks. This study demonstrates the need for Tanzania to make use and/or make adjustment of its laws for effective dispute settlement of banking-related disputes. Originality/value This study appears to be the first paper to draw significant experiences from other jurisdictions to resolve Islamic banking disputes in Tanzania. It is expected to provide a good policy framework for the stakeholders in the Islamic banking industry in Tanzania.


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Wälti ◽  
Ghislaine Weder
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Greet
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Huntington

In Aotearoa New Zealand, as elsewhere, the evidence-based policy movement has been one of the most visible recent influences on how policies are described, discussed and debated. It is now commonly taken for granted that good policy work involves using evidence, and that it is important to increase the influence of data and research uptake during policy development. Promoting evidence-based policy has even been used as the raison d’être for the founding of a political party. However, the voices and perspectives of practitioners themselves are often missing from conversations about evidence’s role in policy work. Drawing on my doctoral research, this article presents three stances that frame how policy workers approach evidence in their practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document