scholarly journals Long-term outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

2016 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 741-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dieter Hahnloser ◽  
John Pemberton
2006 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. S465
Author(s):  
Omid A. Shaye ◽  
Michael Yadegari ◽  
Andrew Ippoliti ◽  
Eric A. Vasiliauskas ◽  
Marla Dubinsky ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Yoon-Jung Sim ◽  
Chaeyoun Oh ◽  
Joong Kee Youn ◽  
Soo-Hong Kim ◽  
Kyu Joo Park ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. A-15
Author(s):  
Zuri A. Murrell ◽  
Eric A. Vasiliauskas ◽  
Marla C. Dubinsky ◽  
Andrew Ippoliti ◽  
Gil Y. Melmed ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuo Kobayashi ◽  
Tsuneo Iiai ◽  
Minoru Yagi ◽  
Haruhiko Okamoto ◽  
Tatsuo Tani ◽  
...  

Abstract An ileal pouch is usually reconstructed as an alternative to a neorectum after a total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the real defecatory function of an ileal pouch is uncertain. This study was designed to analyze the functional and clinical outcomes after a proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) for UC using fecoflowmetry (FFM). Sixteen patients who underwent IPAA for UC between 1990 and 2005 were studied. They were evaluated by FFM, together with Kelly's clinical score (KCS), and anorectal manometric assessments were also performed. FFM showed that the fecoflow pattern (FFP) of 14 patients (87%) was the block type and of 2 patients (13%) was the segmental type. The clinical score and tolerance volume showed no improvement 1 year or more after IPAA. However, the value of the maximum fecal stream flow rate (Fmax) improved with time. FFM shows that the defecatory function improved after IPAA, and it may therefore contribute to a good long-term outcome after the surgery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 726-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramodh Chandrasinghe ◽  
Michele Carvello ◽  
Karin Wasmann ◽  
Caterina Foppa ◽  
Pieter Tanis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [Ta-IPAA] provides better access to the lower pelvis with lower short-term morbidity in ulcerative colitis [UC]. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term functional outcomes after Ta-IPAA vs transabdominal IPAA [Abd-IPAA] in UC. Methods A multicentre cohort analysis was performed between March 2002 and September 2017. Patient characteristics, surgical details and postoperative outcomes were compared. CGQL [Cleveland global quality of life] score at 12 months with a functioning pouch was considered the primary end point. Results A total of 374 patients [100 Ta-IPAA vs 274 Abd-IPAA] were included. Ta-IPAA demonstrated a comparable overall quality of life [CGQL score] to Abd-IPAA [0.75 ± 0.11 vs 0.71 ± 0.14; respectively, p = 0.1]. Quality of life [7.71 ± 1.17 vs 7.30 ± 1.46; p = 0.04] and energy-level items [7.16 ± 1.52 vs 6.66 ± 1.68; p = 0.03] were significantly better after Ta-IPAA, while the quality of health item was comparable [7.68 ± 1.26 vs 7.64 ± 1.44; p = 0.96]. Analysis excluding anastomotic leaks did not change the overall CGQL scores. Stool frequencies [>10/24 h: 22% vs 21%; p = 1.0] and the rate of a single episode of major incontinence during the following 12-month period [27% vs 26%; p = 0.89] were similar. The differences in 30-day morbidity rates [33% vs 41%; p = 0.2] and anastomotic leak rates were not significant [6% vs 13%; p = 0.09]. Conclusions This study provides evidence of comparable long-term functional outcome and quality of life after Ta-IPAA and Abd-IPAA for UC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document