A sequential approach using the age‐adjusted fibrosis‐4 index and vibration‐controlled transient elastography to detect advanced fibrosis in Korean patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease

Author(s):  
Dong Hyeon Lee ◽  
Se Un Sung ◽  
Yun Kyu Lee ◽  
Ik Hyeon Lim ◽  
Heejoon Jang ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. e021787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weixi Jiang ◽  
Sirun Huang ◽  
Hua Teng ◽  
Peipei Wang ◽  
Meng Wu ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the accuracy of staging liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) usingpoint shear wave elastography (pSWE) and transient elastography (TE).SettingRelevant records on NAFLD were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases up to 20 December 2017. A bivariate mixed-effects model was conducted to combine sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between pSWE and TE. A sensitivity analysis was implemented to explore the source of heterogeneity.ParticipantsPatients with NAFLD who had a liver stiffness measurement using pSWE and TE before liver biopsy were enrolled according to the following criteria: 2×2 contingency tables can be calculated via the reported number of cases; sensitivity and specificity were excluded according to the following criteria: history of other hepatic damage, such as chronic hepatitis C, concurrent active hepatitis B infection, autoimmune hepatitis, suspicious drug usage and alcohol abuse.ResultsNine pSWE studies comprising a total of 982 patients and 11 TE studies comprising a total of 1753 patients were included. For detection of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, the summary AUC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.89), 0.94 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.95) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.97) for pSWE, and the summary AUC was 0.85 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.88), 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.97) for TE, respectively. The proportion of failure measurement was over tenfold as common with TE using an M probe compared with pSWE.ConclusionpSWE and TE, providing precise non-invasive staging of liver fibrosis in NAFLD, are promising techniques, particularly for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2415
Author(s):  
Yasaman Vali ◽  
Jenny Lee ◽  
Jérôme Boursier ◽  
René Spijker ◽  
Joanne Verheij ◽  
...  

(1) Background: FibroTest™ is a multi-marker panel, suggested by guidelines as one of the surrogate markers with acceptable performance for detecting fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). A number of studies evaluating this test have been published after publication of the guidelines. This study aims to produce summary estimates of FibroTest™ diagnostic accuracy. (2) Methods: Five databases were searched for studies that evaluated FibroTest™ against liver biopsy as the reference standard in NAFLD patients. Two authors independently screened the references, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Meta-analyses of the accuracy in detecting different levels of fibrosis were performed using the bivariate random-effects model and the linear mixed-effects multiple thresholds model. (3) Results: From ten included studies, seven were eligible for inclusion in our meta-analysis. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis of FibroTest™ in detecting advanced fibrosis and five in significant fibrosis, resulting in an AUC of 0.77 for both target conditions. The meta-analysis of three studies resulted in an AUC of 0.69 in detecting any fibrosis, while analysis of three other studies showed higher accuracy in cirrhosis (AUC: 0.92). (4) Conclusions: Our meta-analysis showed acceptable performance (AUC > 0.80) of FibroTest™ only in detecting cirrhosis. We observed more limited performance of the test in detecting significant and advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients. Further primary studies with high methodological quality are required to validate the reliability of the test for detecting different fibrosis levels and to compare the performance of the test in different settings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. S-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shikha S. Sundaram ◽  
Jillian S. Sullivan ◽  
Ronald J. Sokol ◽  
Kristen N. Robbins ◽  
Kelley Capocelli ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. B. Tapper ◽  
K. Krajewski ◽  
M. Lai ◽  
T. Challies ◽  
R. Kane ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0207479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saleh Daher ◽  
Namma Lev Cohen ◽  
Muhammad Massarwa ◽  
Mahmud Mahamid ◽  
Mira Nasser ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document