scholarly journals Procedural fairness for radiotherapy priority setting in a low resource context

Bioethics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. DeBoer ◽  
Cam Nguyen ◽  
Espérance Mutoniwase ◽  
Anita Ho ◽  
Grace Umutesi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Daniel Wang ◽  
Benedict Rumbold

The justification for the judicial review of priority-setting decisions in the NHS is premised upon a distinction between substantive policy decisions and matters of procedural fairness, with courts themselves perceiving their function as restricted primarily to assessments of procedure. This approach finds normative ground in the ‘procedural turn’ in the philosophical literature on justice in health, in particular in the influential idea of ‘Accountability for Reasonableness’. However, this chapter will argue that relying on the substance/procedure distinction to identify the appropriate role for the courts in the control of allocative decisions in health care will attract to judicial review a series of concerns raised in the philosophical literature with regard to the idea of securing just priority setting through procedural means.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Dittrich ◽  
Stephan Tontrup
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 079-083
Author(s):  
Lawrence Mbuagbaw ◽  
Francisca Monebenimp ◽  
Bolaji Obadeyi ◽  
Grace Bissohong ◽  
Marie-Thérèse Obama ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 295-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karley A Riffe

Faculty work now includes market-like behaviors that create research, teaching, and service opportunities. This study employs an embedded case study design to evaluate the extent to which faculty members interact with external organizations to mitigate financial constraints and how those relationships vary by academic discipline. The findings show a similar number of ties among faculty members in high- and low-resource disciplines, reciprocity between faculty members and external organizations, and an expanded conceptualization of faculty work.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document