Dynamic logistic state‐space prediction model for clinical decision making

Biometrics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiakun Jiang ◽  
Wei Yang ◽  
Erin M. Schnellinger ◽  
Stephen E. Kimmel ◽  
Wensheng Guo
2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 52S-68S ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Bradbury ◽  
Donald J. Adam ◽  
Jocelyn Bell ◽  
John F. Forbes ◽  
F. Gerry R. Fowkes ◽  
...  

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuliang Chen ◽  
Zhien Zhou ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
Xingcheng Wu ◽  
Yu Xiao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Due to the invasiveness of prostate biopsy, a prediction model of the individual risk of a positive biopsy result could be helpful to guide clinical decision-making. Most existing models are based on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy. On the other hand, transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy (TTPB) has been reported to be more accurate in evaluating prostate cancer. The objective of this study is to develop a prediction model of the detection of high-grade prostate cancer (HGPC) on initial TTPB. Result A total of 1352 out of 3794 (35.6%) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer, 848 of whom had tumour with Grade Group 2–5. Age, PSA, PV, DRE and f/t PSA are independent predictors of HGPC with p < 0.001. The model showed good discrimination ability (c-index 0.886) and calibration during internal validation and good clinical performance was observed through decision curve analysis. The external validation of CPCC-RC, an existing model, demonstrated that models based on TRUS-guided biopsy may underestimate the risk of HGPC in patients who underwent TTPB. Conclusion We established a prediction model which showed good discrimination ability and calibration in predicting the detection of HGPC by initial TTPB. This model can be used to aid clinical decision making for Chinese patients and other Asian populations with similar genomic backgrounds, after external validations are conducted to further confirm its clinical applicability.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document