Finding the voice of students engaging in online alternative provision via digital data collection methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 899-914
Author(s):  
Sharon Smith
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Artur Petrosyan ◽  
Hayk Azizbekyan ◽  
Boris Gasparyan ◽  
Roberto Dan ◽  
Arsen Bobokhyan ◽  
...  

Overview Daily data collection during archaeological fieldwork forms the basis for later interpretation and analysis. Across the world, we observe a wide variety of digital data collection methods and tools employed during fieldwork. Here, we detail the daily practices at four recent survey and excavation projects in the South Caucasian country of Armenia. As archaeology continues to become ever more digital, it is useful to consider these day-to-day recording processes at a typical field project. We provide details on both the types of data collected and the ways they are collected so as to foreground these topics. Finally, we reflect on how our work is currently impacted by digital changes and how it may continue to change in the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1716-1734
Author(s):  
Grace M. Cutchin ◽  
Laura W. Plexico ◽  
Aurora J. Weaver ◽  
Mary J. Sandage

Purpose To assess data collection variability in the voice range profile (VRP) across clinicians and researchers, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate the extent of variability of specific data collection points that affect the determination of frequency range and sound level and determine next steps in standardization of a VRP protocol. Method A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis checklist. Full-text journal articles were identified through PubMed, Web of Science, Psych Info, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Google Scholar, and hand searching of journals. Results A total of 1,134 articles were retrieved from the search; of these, 463 were duplicates. Titles and abstracts of 671 articles were screened, with 202 selected for full-text review. Fifty-four articles were considered eligible for inclusion. The information extracted from these articles revealed the methodology used to derive the VRP was extremely variable across the data points selected. Additionally, there were eight common acoustic measures used for statistical analysis described in included studies that were added as a data point. Conclusions The data collection methods for the VRP varied considerably. Standardization of procedures was recommended for clinicians and researchers.


1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Mitchell ◽  
Winston Bennett ◽  
J. J. Weissmuller ◽  
R. L. Gosc ◽  
Patricia Waldroop ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Weigold ◽  
Ingrid K. Weigold ◽  
Elizabeth J. Russell ◽  
John Shook ◽  
Sara N. Natera ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 103538
Author(s):  
Yantao Yu ◽  
Waleed Umer ◽  
Xincong Yang ◽  
Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document