IS THERE A CURSE OF RELOCATION? ANALYSING THE CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN OFFSHORING AND THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF (SMALL) FIRMS

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Mitze ◽  
Fabian Kreutzer
Keyword(s):  
Small Firms ◽  
Causal Link ◽  
Innovation Performance

scholarly journals Openness and Innovation Performance: Are Small Firms Different?

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 553-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priit Vahter ◽  
James H. Love ◽  
Stephen Roper
Keyword(s):  
Small Firms ◽  
Innovation Performance

A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from Turkey

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (06) ◽  
pp. 1750038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Findik ◽  
Berna Beyhan
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Innovation Performance ◽  
Large Firms ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Process Innovations ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Process Oriented ◽  
Product And Process ◽  
The Impact

This paper aims to introduce a qualitative indicator to measure innovation performance of Turkish firms by using firm-level data collected by Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT) in 2008 and 2009. We propose a new indicator to measure the innovation performance which is simply based on the perception of firms regarding to the impacts of innovation. In order to create performance indicators, we conduct a factor analysis to group the firms’ perceptions on the impacts of innovation. Factor analysis gives us product and process-oriented impacts of innovation. There are significant differences among product innovators, process innovators and firms engaged in both product and process innovations with respect to their perceptions on product and process-oriented impacts of innovation. Among these three groups, product- and process-oriented impacts provide a highest value for the firms that perform both product and process innovations. As far as the link between firm characteristics and the impact of innovation is considered, there is a significant difference between small and large firms with respect to their perceptions on product-oriented impact of innovation. While product-oriented impact is larger for small firms, large firms focus more on process-oriented impact. Anova results also indicate that perceptions on process-oriented impact significantly differ among exporter firms, domestic market-oriented firms and firms being active in internal and external markets. Process-oriented impact generates results in favor of exporting firms.

Firm innovation and access to finance: firm-level evidence from India

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parneet Kaur ◽  
Navneet Kaur ◽  
Paras Kanojia
Keyword(s):  
Small Firms ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Innovation Performance ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Firm Innovation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Based on 9,281 firm-level survey data on micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in India, this study aims to investigate how access to different finance sources and collateral requirement facilitates the firm’s innovation activity across industries. Design/methodology/approach This paper used ordered logit regression models using Stata software for explanatory variables to measure the impact of explanatory variables on firm innovation performance. Firms’ innovation performance is measured through the aggregate innovation index obtained by adding up the no. of “new-to-firm” activities. Findings The empirical results reveal that external sources of funding impact innovation activity than other financing sources. Also, the requirement of collateral for financing impacts innovation performance significantly. This paper finds that firms funded by state-owned banks or government agency are more actively engaged in innovation activities. The firm’s size, ownership structure and location of the firm also show the varying innovation performance. This paper found variation in innovation performance across industries as well. Practical implications First, the present study underlines the significance of funding sources. Second, minimizing the need for collateral to obtain external finance boosts small firms’ innovation activity and will also trigger overall economic growth. Finally, while making policies for ownership transformation of state-owned institutions, policymakers should discuss these policies’ impact on innovative firms. Originality/value What facilitates innovation performance in an emerging market is missing in the literature for MSMEs, largely due to lack of data. It is reasonable not to generalize innovation knowledge in large firms to small firms because of the constraints, particularly MSMEs face.

Strategic Foresight for Innovation Management: A Review and Research Agenda

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (04) ◽  
pp. 1750019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abiodun Adegbile ◽  
David Sarpong ◽  
Dirk Meissner
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Management ◽  
Causal Link ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Innovation Performance ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Integrative Framework ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Academic Publications ◽  
Strategic Foresight ◽  
Contemporary Management

The concept of strategic foresight has come to dominate contemporary management discourse in recent times with a remarkable upsurge in the number of scholarly papers reporting a positive influence of strategic foresight on innovation. This causal link has served not only as a point of convergence for many empirical and conceptual studies, but also the starting point for theorizing the relevance of strategic foresight in organizing. Drawing on an exhaustive sample of 258 academic publications from 1990–2014, this paper provides a comprehensive review of strategic foresight and its influence on innovation. Our review suggest that strategic foresight rather than directly resulting in innovation tend to rather influence it by shaping and giving form to innovation management tools, and future-oriented knowledge creation, which in turn cumulatively drive innovation performance. Our proposed integrative framework therefore specifies the conceptual linkages between strategic foresight and innovation performance.

The Effects of Share Repurchase Announcements on Returns in the Malaysia Stock Market

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tze San Ong ◽  
Pei San Ng
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Abnormal Return ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Share Repurchase ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Positive Abnormal Return ◽  
Repurchase Announcements ◽  
Signaling Hypothesis ◽  
Firm Characteristic

This paper examines the market response surrounding the share repurchase announcements of Malaysia Listed Companies from years 2012 to 2016. One sample T-test was carried out to identify the abnormal return in the range before and after 20 days from share repurchase announcements. The result shows a significant positive abnormal return in the day of repurchase announcements and continuously until day 1 after the announcements. Multiple regression analysis was performed in order to identify the firm characteristic of share repurchase. The finding is supported with information asymmetric, which shows that stock market reacts more favorably through the repurchase announcements by small firms than large firms. This study is consistent with the signaling hypothesis that shows share repurchase announcement can be an effective tool in stabilizing the stock market in Malaysia. The finding of this study acts as a useful tool for managers and investors to improve their decisions on share repurchase announcements in Malaysia. Company’s managers can conduct share repurchase announcements that are able to make the stock market react positively in order to generate positive abnormal returns.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document