Effects of plant diversity on soil carbon in diverse ecosystems: a global meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinli Chen ◽  
Han Y. H. Chen ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Zilong Ma ◽  
Eric B. Searle ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Chen

<p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a valuable resource for mediating global climate change and securing food production. Despite an alarming rate of global plant diversity loss, uncertainties concerning the effects of plant diversity on SOC remain, because plant diversity not only stimulates litter inputs <em>via</em> increased productivity, thus enhancing SOC, but also stimulates microbial respiration, thus reducing SOC. By analysing 1001 paired observations of plant mixtures and corresponding monocultures from 121 publications, we show that both SOC content and stock are on average 5 and 8% higher in species mixtures than in monocultures. These positive mixture effects increase over time and are more pronounced in deeper soils. Microbial biomass carbon, an indicator of SOC release and formation, also increases, but the proportion of microbial biomass carbon in SOC is lower in mixtures. Moreover, these species‐mixture effects are consistent across forest, grassland, and cropland systems and are independent of background climates. Our results indicate that converting 50% of global forests from mixtures to monocultures would release an average of 2.70 Pg C from soil annually over a period of 20 years: about 30% of global annual fossil‐fuel emissions. Our study highlights the importance of plant diversity preservation for the maintenance of soil carbon sequestration in discussions of global climate change policy.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 36-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinzhong Zhang ◽  
Dexin Guan ◽  
Weibin Li ◽  
Di Sun ◽  
Changjie Jin ◽  
...  

Geoderma ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 411 ◽  
pp. 115694
Author(s):  
Yakun Zhang ◽  
Sai Peng ◽  
Xinli Chen ◽  
Han Y.H. Chen

2020 ◽  
Vol 454 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 299-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Huang ◽  
César Terrer ◽  
Feike A. Dijkstra ◽  
Bruce A. Hungate ◽  
Weijian Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 107735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinshi Jian ◽  
Xuan Du ◽  
Mark S. Reiter ◽  
Ryan D. Stewart

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1659-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guiying Jiang ◽  
Wenju Zhang ◽  
Minggang Xu ◽  
Yakov Kuzyakov ◽  
Xubo Zhang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 7423-7433 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Xu ◽  
L. L. Liu ◽  
E. J. Sayer

Abstract. Global change has been shown to alter the amount of above-ground litter inputs to soil greatly, which could cause substantial cascading effects on below-ground biogeochemical cycling. Despite extensive study, there is uncertainty about how changes in above-ground litter inputs affect soil carbon and nutrient turnover and transformation. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis on 70 litter-manipulation experiments in order to assess how changes in above-ground litter inputs alter soil physicochemical properties, carbon dynamics and nutrient cycles. Our results demonstrated that litter removal decreased soil respiration by 34%, microbial biomass carbon in the mineral soil by 39% and total carbon in the mineral soil by 10%, whereas litter addition increased them by 31, 26 and 10%, respectively. This suggests that greater litter inputs increase the soil carbon sink despite higher rates of carbon release and transformation. Total nitrogen and extractable inorganic nitrogen in the mineral soil decreased by 17 and 30%, respectively, under litter removal, but were not altered by litter addition. Overall, litter manipulation had a significant impact upon soil temperature and moisture, but not soil pH; litter inputs were more crucial in buffering soil temperature and moisture fluctuations in grassland than in forest. Compared to other ecosystems, tropical and subtropical forests were more sensitive to variation in litter inputs, as altered litter inputs affected the turnover and accumulation of soil carbon and nutrients more substantially over a shorter time period. Our study demonstrates that although the magnitude of responses differed greatly among ecosystems, the direction of the responses was very similar across different ecosystems. Interactions between plant productivity and below-ground biogeochemical cycling need to be taken into account to predict ecosystem responses to environmental change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document