litter removal
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

97
(FIVE YEARS 20)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Geoderma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 401 ◽  
pp. 115318
Author(s):  
Yang Wu ◽  
HuaKun Zhou ◽  
WenJing Chen ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genevieve C. Anderegg ◽  
Jonathan J. Henn ◽  
John L. Orrock ◽  
Ellen I. Damschen

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Jing ◽  
Peng Tian ◽  
Qingkui Wang ◽  
Weibin Li ◽  
Zhaolin Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inputs of above- and belowground litter into forest soils are changing at an unprecedented rate due to continuing human disturbances and climate change. Microorganisms drive the soil carbon (C) cycle, but the roles of above- and belowground litter in regulating the soil microbial community have not been evaluated at a global scale. Methods Here, we conducted a meta-analysis based on 68 aboveground litter removal and root exclusion studies across forest ecosystems to quantify the roles of above- and belowground litter on soil microbial community and compare their relative importance. Results Aboveground litter removal significantly declined soil microbial biomass by 4.9% but root exclusion inhibited it stronger, up to 11.7%. Moreover, the aboveground litter removal significantly raised fungi by 10.1% without altering bacteria, leading to a 46.7% increase in the fungi-to-bacteria (F/B) ratio. Differently, root exclusion significantly decreased the fungi by 26.2% but increased the bacteria by 5.7%, causing a 13.3% decrease in the F/B ratio. Specifically, root exclusion significantly inhibited arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, ectomycorrhizal fungi, and actinomycetes by 22.9%, 43.8%, and 7.9%, respectively. The negative effects of aboveground litter removal on microbial biomass increased with mean annual temperature and precipitation, whereas that of root exclusion on microbial biomass did not change with climatic factors but amplified with treatment duration. More importantly, greater effects of root exclusion on microbial biomass than aboveground litter removal were consistent across diverse forest biomes (expect boreal forests) and durations. Conclusions These data provide a global evidence that root litter inputs exert a larger control on microbial biomass than aboveground litter inputs in forest ecosystems. Our study also highlights that changes in above- and belowground litter inputs could alter soil C stability differently by shifting the microbial community structure in the opposite direction. These findings are useful for predicting microbe-mediated C processes in response to changes in forest management or climate.


Marine Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 104450
Author(s):  
Marga Andrés ◽  
Matthias Delpey ◽  
Irene Ruiz ◽  
Amandine Declerck ◽  
Caroline Sarrade ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xiang Zheng ◽  
Shuli Wang ◽  
Xingtong Xu ◽  
Bangliang Deng ◽  
Xiaojun Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 755 ◽  
pp. 142659
Author(s):  
Ramona J. Heim ◽  
Wieland Heim ◽  
Galina F. Darman ◽  
Thilo Heinken ◽  
Sergei M. Smirenski ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J. Sayer ◽  
Catherine Baxendale ◽  
Ali J. Birkett ◽  
Laëtitia M. Bréchet ◽  
Biancolini Castro ◽  
...  

AbstractSoil organic matter (SOM) in tropical forests is an important store of carbon (C) and nutrients. Although SOM storage could be affected by global changes via altered plant productivity, we know relatively little about SOM stabilisation and turnover in tropical forests compared to temperate systems. Here, we investigated changes in soil C and N within particle size fractions representing particulate organic matter (POM) and mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) after 13 years of experimental litter removal (L−) and litter addition (L+) treatments in a  lowland tropical forest. We hypothesized that reduced nitrogen (N) availability in L− plots would result in N-mining of MAOM, whereas long-term litter addition would increase POM, without altering the C:N ratio of SOM fractions. Overall, SOM-N declined more than SOM-C with litter removal, providing evidence of N-mining in the L− plots, which increased the soil C:N ratio. However, contrary to expectations, the C:N ratio increased most in the largest POM fraction, whereas the C:N ratio of MAOM remained unchanged. We did not observe the expected increases in POM with litter addition, which we attribute to rapid turnover of unprotected SOM. Measurements of ion exchange rates to assess changes in N availability and soil chemistry revealed that litter removal increased the mobility of ammonium-N and aluminium, whereas litter addition increased the mobility of nitrate-N and iron, which could indicate SOM priming in both treatments. Our study suggests that altered litter inputs affect multiple processes contributing to SOM storage and we propose potential mechanisms to inform future work.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document