Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 365-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Roehling ◽  
Karl A. Schlegel ◽  
Henriette Woelfler ◽  
Michael Gahlert
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Hafezeqoran ◽  
Roodabeh Koodaryan

Background. The information available about osseointegration and the bone to implant interaction of zirconia implants with various surface modifications is still far from sufficient.Objective. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare zirconia dental implants with different surface topographies, with a focus on bone to implant contact and removal torque.Methods. The systematic review of the extracted publications was performed to compare the bone to implant contact (BIC) with removal torque (RT) values of titanium dental implants and machined and surfaced modified zirconia implants.Results. A total of fifteen articles on BIC and RT values were included in the quantitative analysis. No significant difference in the BIC values was observed between titanium and machined zirconia implants (p=0.373; 95% CI:-0.166 to 0.443). However, a significantly better BIC values were observed for acid etched zirconia implants compared with those of titanium implants (p=0.032; 95% CI: 0.068 to 1.461). Unmodified zirconia implants showed favorable BIC values compared to modified-surface zirconia implants (p=0.021; 95% CI:-0.973 to-0.080).Conclusion. Acid etched zirconia implants may serve as a possible substitute for successful osseointegration.


Author(s):  
Fernanda Viana Cabral ◽  
Tiago Henrique dos Santos Souza ◽  
Fábio Parra Sellera ◽  
Adriana Fontes ◽  
Martha Simões Ribeiro

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 842-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Altuna ◽  
E. Lucas-Taulé ◽  
J. Gargallo-Albiol ◽  
O. Figueras-Álvarez ◽  
F. Hernández-Alfaro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Fernanda Cardoso ◽  
Jéssica Breder ◽  
Priscila Apolinário ◽  
Henrique Oliveia ◽  
Maria Saidel ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Plantago major is a medicinal plant that has been used for centuries to treat various health conditions including wounds. PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness of the topical use of P major in healing skin wounds in animal models. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Seven (7) electronic databases (Virtual Health Library, Public/Publisher MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and CAB Direct) were searched for controlled studies published in English from January 2006 to March 2020. The Collaborative Approach to Meta Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies tools guided the evaluation of the studies and determined their quality. The Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: Of the 176 publications identified, 4 met the inclusion criteria. Studies included 20 to 100 animals and varying concentrations of P major. There were no reports of losses during research. Wound healing was assessed between 17 and 21 days following wounding. The best response in terms of wound contraction rate occurred with 10%, 20%, and 50% concentrations when compared with control groups. One (1) study did not have an animal ethics committee review. All studies had a high risk of bias and a lack of methodological rigor. CONCLUSION: The results of this review did not find evidence about the in vivo effectiveness of P major for wound healing. More rigorous preclinical studies with adequate sample sizes are required to identify the best concentrations and formulations as well as increase understanding about the mechanisms of action of P major in wound healing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 439-452
Author(s):  
Naira Figueiredo Deana ◽  
Nilton Alves ◽  
Carlos Zaror ◽  
Mariano del Sol ◽  
Vanderlei Salvador Bagnato

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arkadiusz Makowiecki ◽  
Jakub Hadzik ◽  
Artur Błaszczyszyn ◽  
Tomasz Gedrange ◽  
Marzena Dominiak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document