Textile‐induced vulvar and perianal dermatitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-67
Author(s):  
Allie Preston ◽  
Kelsie Riemenschneider ◽  
Mariam Guenther ◽  
Ponciano D. Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Perianal Dermatitis

Perianal Dermatitis in a Child

1998 ◽  
Vol 134 (9) ◽  
pp. 1145-c-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Bugatti
Keyword(s):  
Perianal Dermatitis

Streptococcal Perianal Dermatitis in Three Adults

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-385
Author(s):  
Kiyofumi EGAWA
Keyword(s):  
Perianal Dermatitis

Group C Streptococcal Surgical Wound Infections Transmitted by an Anorectal and Nasal Carrier

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-237
Author(s):  
Donald A. Goldmann ◽  
Sylvia J. Breton
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Infection ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
Postoperative Wound ◽  
Nasal Carrier ◽  
Surgical Infection ◽  
Oral Penicillin ◽  
Perianal Dermatitis ◽  
Lancefield Group

Streptococcus equisimilis (Lancefield group C), an unusual cause of nosocomial surgical infection, was isolated from two orthopedic postoperative wound infections. Both operations had been performed by the same surgeon within a three-day period. Examination of the surgeon revealed perianal dermatitis from which S. equisimilis was isolated. The organism was also recovered from the surgeon's nose and rectum. The wound infections responded to treatment with penicillin derivatives. The surgeon was successfully treated with topical bacitracin and oral penicillin and vancomycin. This report documents the pathogenicity of the C Streptococcus in postoperative infection and suggests a possible nosocomial source of the organism.

scholarly journals Idiopathic Pruritus Ani and Acute Perianal Dermatitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (05) ◽  
pp. 327-332
Author(s):  
Adrián E. Ortega ◽  
Xavier Delgadillo
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Practical Approach ◽  
Pruritus Ani ◽  
Perianal Dermatitis

AbstractThis article reviews the etiologies, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and treatment of idiopathic pruritus ani and perianal dermatitis. It underscores a practical approach to each of these common proctologic conditions.

The relationship of perianal dermatitis to fecal pH

1959 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 793-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Tanino ◽  
Steiner Morris ◽  
Benjamin Bernard
Keyword(s):  
Perianal Dermatitis ◽  
Fecal Ph ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Routine anal cleansing, so-called hemorrhoids, and perianal dermatitis

2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henning Rohde
Keyword(s):  
Perianal Dermatitis

Bacterial Perianal Dermatitis

2000 ◽  
Vol 342 (25) ◽  
pp. 1877-1877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heikki Peltola
Keyword(s):  
Perianal Dermatitis

Bacterial perianal dermatitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis with intrafamily spread: Report of a rare case

2015 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 043-046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stamo Theotokatou ◽  
Maria Niopa ◽  
Alexandros Kallinikos ◽  
Panagiotis Saravakos
Keyword(s):  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Perianal Dermatitis

scholarly journals Cow’s Milk Allergy Is a Major Contributor in Recurrent Perianal Dermatitis of Infants

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa Abdel-Aziz El-Hodhod ◽  
Ahmad Mohamed Hamdy ◽  
Marwa Talaat El-Deeb ◽  
Mohamed O. Elmaraghy
Keyword(s):  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Cow’S Milk Allergy ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Bloody Stool ◽  
Milk Allergy ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Anal Fissures ◽  
Cow's Milk Allergy ◽  
Perianal Dermatitis ◽  
Reducing Substances

Background. Recurrent perianal inflammation has great etiologic diversity. A possible cause is cow’s milk allergy (CMA). The aim was to assess the magnitude of this cause. Subjects and Methods. This follow up clinical study was carried out on 63 infants with perianal dermatitis of more than 3 weeks with history of recurrence. Definitive diagnosis was made for each infant through medical history taking, clinical examination and investigations including stool analysis and culture, stool pH and reducing substances, perianal swab for different cultures and staining for Candida albicans. Complete blood count and quantitative determination of cow’s milk-specific serum IgE concentration were done for all patients. CMA was confirmed through an open withdrawal-rechallenge procedure. Serum immunoglobulins and CD markers as well as gastrointestinal endoscopies were done for some patients. Results. Causes of perianal dermatitis included CMA (47.6%), bacterial dermatitis (17.46%), moniliasis (15.87%), enterobiasis (9.52%) and lactose intolerance (9.5%). Predictors of CMA included presence of bloody and/or mucoid stool, other atopic manifestations, anal fissures, or recurrent vomiting. Conclusion. We can conclude that cow’s milk allergy is a common cause of recurrent perianal dermatitis. Mucoid or bloody stool, anal fissures or ulcers, vomiting and atopic manifestations can predict this etiology.

scholarly journals Realimentación por estoma distal en una serie de casos de niños con ileostomía: un posible método para facilitar la restitución del tránsito intestinal

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
María Zornoza Moreno ◽  
José Alejandro Ruiz Montañez
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Anastomotic Dehiscence ◽  
Intestinal Atresia ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Ileostomy Closure ◽  
Intestinal Damage ◽  
Normal Height ◽  
Perianal Dermatitis ◽  
Macroscopic Findings ◽  
Bowel Segments

OBJETIVO: exponer y describir una técnica de realimentación en niños con ileostomía que permite aumentar la curva de crecimiento y disminuir las dehiscencias anastomóticas y dermatitis posoperatoria.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio retrospectivo de serie de casos de pacientes con ileostomía tratados con la técnica de realimentación de estoma distal, previa a la restitución del tránsito intestinal, atendidos durante el año 2014. Se revisó el padecimiento que condicionó la derivación, la edad y peso al inicio de la realimentación, ganancia ponderal, duración de la realimentación, hallazgos macroscópicos en el cierre de ileostomía y repercusiones posoperatorias.RESULTADOS: se estudiaron siete pacientes, cuatro de ellos tuvieron atresia intestinal, uno sospecha de enfermedad de Hirschsprung, otro enterocolitis y otro sufrimiento intestinal postinvaginación. La realimentación se inició a una edad media de 5 meses de vida y peso medio de 4.4 kg. La ganancia ponderal fue de 0.7 kg al mes, en promedio, (rango 0.36-1.4 kg al mes). No se encontró desproporción entre los cabos. No hubo ninguna dehiscencia anastomótica ni dermatitis perianal posoperatoria. Luego del seguimiento durante dos años, seis pacientes tienen curva ponderal y talla normal para su edad.CONCLUSIONES: la realimentación es una técnica fácil, segura y barata que permite aumentar la ganancia ponderal del paciente, evitar la atrofia del segmento intestinal, disminuir la pérdida de líquidos y electrólitos y preparar el intestino distal para la futura anastomosis.PALABRAS CLAVE: realimentación; estoma; ileostomía; cierre de la ileostomía; atresia intestinal; intestino. Abstract OBJECTIVE: To present and describe a feedback technique in children with ileostomy that allows to increase the growth curve and decrease anastomotic dehiscence and postoperative dermatitis.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present 7 patients with ileostomy, treated with the refeeding technique during 2014 in the ColorectalCenter. We review why the derivation was performed, the age and the weight when the refeeding was begun, the weight gained, how long the refeeding was carried out, the macroscopic findings during the ileostomy closure and the outcome.RESULTS: Four patients had intestinal atresia, 1 patient was suspected of Hirschsprung's disease, one had necrotizing enterocolitis and another had an intestinal intussusception with intestinal damage. The refeeding was begun at 5 months old on average and with 4.4kg on average. The weight gain was 0.7kg per month on average (range 0.36- 1.4kg per month). We found no disproportion between the bowel segments. There was neither anastomotic dehiscence nor postoperative perianal dermatitis. After 2 years of follow-up, 6 patients have normal weight curve and normal height curve for their age.CONCLUSIONS: The refeeding is an easy, safe and inexpensive technique to increase the patient weight gain, to prevent the atrophy of the intestinal segment, to reduce fluid and electrolyte loss and to prepare the bowel for the future intestinal anastomosis.KEY WORDS: refeeding; stoma; intestinal; ileostomy; ileostomy closure; intestinal atresia, bowel.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document