Response to Jensenet al. (2014): Pelvic floor reconstruction with a biological mesh after extralevator abdominoperineal excision leads tolow wound complications and perineal hernia rates with minor movement limitations

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 563-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Musters ◽  
W. A. Bemelman ◽  
P. J. Tanis
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
N. A. Domansky ◽  
V. V. Semiglazov ◽  
A. M. Karachun ◽  
K. K. Lebedev ◽  
D. V. Samsonov ◽  
...  

Background. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision is associated with a high incidence of perineal wound complications. There is no uniform standard for choosing the method for pelvic floor reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision.The purpose of the study was to compare the results of extralevator abdominoperineal excisions of the rectum using various methods of perineal wound closure.Materials and Methods. Between 2014 and 2018, 120 patients underwent extralevator abdominoperineal excisions of the rectum using various options for closure of the pelvic floor. The patients were divided into 3 groups. Group I patients (n=64) underwent simple plasty of the peritoneal wound. Group II patients (n=43) underwent myoplasty using the gluteus maximus muscle. Group III patients (n=13) underwent myoplasty using the rectus abdominis muscle. The incidence of perineal wound complications in the early postoperative period was assessed.Results. The total number of perineal wound complications in Group I, II and III was 33 (51.5 %), 13 (30.2 %), and 6 (46.1 %), respectively. Grade IIIA-IIIB complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were observed in 25 % of Group I patients, in 18.6 % of Group II patients and in 7.7 % of Group II patients. Postoperative perineal wound complications occurred more often in Group I patients after simple plasty than in Group II and III patients after myoplasty (51.5 % versus 30.2 %). However, perineal wound complications were observed more often in Group III than in Group II (46.1 % versus 30.2 %, respectively). No significant differences in the frequency of complications between 3 groups were found.Conclusion. Using various options for closure of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdominoperineal excisions of the rectum, there was a tendency to reduction in the incidence of grade IIIA-IIIB perineal wound complications.


Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 8818-8824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Ge ◽  
Song-song Jiang ◽  
Wang Qi ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Li-ming Zheng ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. O. Kavanagh ◽  
H. Imran ◽  
A. Almoudaris ◽  
P. Ziprin ◽  
O. Faiz

A 72-year-old female presented with a six-month history of increased frequency of defecation, rectal bleeding, and severe rectal pain. Digital rectal examination and endoscopy revealed a low rectal lesion lying anteriorly. This was confirmed histologically as adenocarcinoma. Radiological staging was consistent with a T3N2rectal tumour. Following long-course chemoradiotherapy repeat staging did not identify any metastatic disease. She underwent a laparoscopic cylindrical abdominoperineal excision withen blocresection of the coccyx and posterior wall of the vagina with a negative circumferential resection margin. The perineal defect was reconstructed with Permacol (biological implant, Covidien) mesh. She had no clinical evidence of a perineal hernia at serial followup. Dynamic MRI images of the pelvic floor obtained during valsalva at 10 months revealed an intact pelvic floor. A control case that had undergone a conventional abdominoperineal excision with primary perineal closure without clinical evidence of herniation was also imaged. This confirmed subclinical perineal herniation with significant downward migration of the bowel and bladder below the pubococcygeal line. We eagerly await further evidence supporting a role for dynamic MR imaging in assessing the integrity of a reconstructed pelvic floor following cylindrical abdominoperineal excision.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil K. Narang ◽  
Nasra N. Alam ◽  
Ferdinand Köckerling ◽  
Ian R. Daniels ◽  
Neil J. Smart

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1120-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Jones ◽  
J. Nowers ◽  
N. J. Smart ◽  
J. Coelho ◽  
A. Watts ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document