Response to Bell et al ., ‘The effect of increasing body mass index on laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer’

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 931-931
Author(s):  
S. K. Sood ◽  
P. Kang ◽  
U. Ihedioha ◽  
J. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer

scholarly journals The effect of increasing body mass index on laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 778-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bell ◽  
J. C. Kong ◽  
R. Wale ◽  
M. Staples ◽  
K. Oliva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer

scholarly journals Oncologic evaluation of obesity as a factor in patients with rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a propensity-matched analysis using body mass index

2019 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Il Tae Son ◽  
Duck-Woo Kim ◽  
Eun Kyung Choe ◽  
Young Hoon Kim ◽  
Kyoung Ho Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Body Mass

Body mass index and risk of colon and rectal cancer stratified by tumor location and sex

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 592-593
Author(s):  
P.T. Campbell ◽  
M. Manno ◽  
J.R. McLaughlin ◽  
M. Cotterchio ◽  
N. Klar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer

scholarly journals Co-twin control and cohort analyses of body mass index and height in relation to breast, prostate, ovarian, corpus uteri, colon and rectal cancer among Swedish and Finnish twins

2007 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 810-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Lundqvist ◽  
Jaakko Kaprio ◽  
Pia K. Verkasalo ◽  
Eero Pukkala ◽  
Markku Koskenvuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Corpus Uteri ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cohort Analyses

scholarly journals Adolescent body mass index and risk of colon and rectal cancer in a cohort of 1.79 million Israeli men and women: A population-based study

Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (20) ◽  
pp. 4022-4030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zohar Levi ◽  
Jeremy D. Kark ◽  
Lior H. Katz ◽  
Gilad Twig ◽  
Estela Derazne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer

Impact of Increased Body Mass Index on Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tayfun Karahasanoglu ◽  
Ismail Hamzaoglu ◽  
Bilgi Baca ◽  
Erman Aytac ◽  
Ebru Kirbiyik
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Body Mass

Assessment of Circumferential Resection Margins (CRM) clearance in Conventional open Versus Laparoscopic Cancer Rectum Resection

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim H Bayan ◽  
Ahmed Abdelaziz ◽  
Tarek Youssef Ahmed ◽  
Mohamed Magdy
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Laparoscopy Group ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Colon and rectal cancer represent the fourth commonest malignancy worldwide. Globally, colon and rectal cancer make up 9.4% and 10.1% in men and women of all cancers, respectively. Colon and rectal tumors are the third most common malignancy after breast and lung cancer, respectively. The main management of rectal cancer involves a multi-disciplinary team approach and an individually tailored treatment routine. Operative surgery remains the primary and definitive treatment for locally confined rectal adenocarcinoma and is the only historical and current treatment which allows for cure. Resection of the colon and rectal cancer can be done either by open surgical excision or laparoscopically. Aim of the work The objective is to compare the radicality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in both open and laparoscopic surgery through the pathology report. Methods In this multicentric, prospective, comparative study, we included the pathologically established rectal cancer patients from 2 hospitals in Cairo, Egypt, Ain Shams University Hospitals and Maadi Military Hospital, Egypt between 2013 and 2016. The sample size was 40 patients divided into two groups; 20 patients for laparoscopic arm and 20 patients for the open trans-abdominal surgery. Inclusion criteria: histopathology confirmed rectal cancer, patients fit for operative resection, and with T1- T3 grades according to the preoperative evaluation. The exclusion criteria: Patients with T4 stage tumor, patients present as emergency cases and patients present with recurrence of the tumor and synchronous colonic tumors. Results The circumferential resection margins (CRM) of the mesorectum when examined pathologically after resection showed no difference between the two arms of the study with laparoscopic group specimens 3.18±1.16 mm mean, (SD) compared to 3.50±0.45 mm mean, (SD) in the open surgery group with no statistically significant difference. The longitudinal resection margins (LRM) was (5.50±1.98 mean, SD) in the laparoscopic group compared to (5.20±2.28 mean, SD) in the open conventional surgery group with no significant difference found between the two groups. Total operative time was significantly shorter in the trans-abdominal surgery group, while the hospital stay period was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group. Laparoscopy group also showed significantly time before flatus passage, and the patients in the laparoscopy group started oral intake faster than open surgery group. Conclusion In our study, the radicality of the rectal cancer excision in both laparoscopic and traditional open surgery, showed non inferiority of the laparoscopic technique over open surgery Long-term clinical outcomes of overall survival and recurrence is the foremost parameters which should be taken in consideration for decision for laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Additional follow-up results from the current trial are presently being developed, beside with records on other secondary end points, like cost effectiveness and quality of life.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: increasing body mass index does not impact postoperative complications

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. William Helm ◽  
Cibi Arumugam ◽  
Mary E. Gordinier ◽  
Daniel S. Metzinger ◽  
Jianmin Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Body Mass
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document