Limited benefit of pentostatin salvage therapy for steroid-refractory grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 930-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naheed Alam ◽  
Eshetu G. Atenafu ◽  
Garwin Tse ◽  
Auro Viswabandya ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
Gabriel Tremblay ◽  
Dimitrios Tomaras ◽  
Eric Strati ◽  
Anna Forsythe

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can be a lifesaving treatment for hematologic malignancies, but acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) is a potentially deadly adverse effect experienced by up to half of allo-HSCT recipients. Inadequate response to steroid therapy for aGVHD is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality, including among pediatric patients, who are the focus of this study. Ruxolitinib and remestemcel-L-rknd were evaluated for the treatment of steroid-refractory (SR) aGVHD in two separate single-arm trials. To effectively compare the safety and efficacy of these treatments without a head-to-head trial, a simulated treatment comparison (STC) was conducted. Methods: Regression techniques were used to adjust individual patient-level data from the remestemcel-L-rknd trial to mutually reported baseline characteristics from the ruxolitinib trial. Outcomes of interest included a 28-day overall response rate (ORR), a 28-day ORR in the grade III-IV aGVHD population, and adverse events (AEs). Results: In the full populations, the STC of risk ratios (RRs) found treatment with remestemcel-L-rknd to be associated with a numerical but not statistically significant improvement in the 28-day ORR versus ruxolitinib. In the grade III-IV aGVHD sub-group, the STC showed significantly improved 28-day ORR for remestemcel-L-rknd versus ruxolitinib (P=0.04). Remestemcel-L-rknd was also associated with improved safety outcomes (P<0.05) in 17 out of 30 AEs, including hematologic events, peripheral edema, muscular weakness, nausea, back pain, and fatigue. Conclusion: Remestemcel-L-rknd was associated with significant improvements in day 28 ORR compared with ruxolitinib in patients with severe (grade III-IV) SR aGVHD. Across all grades of SR aGVHD, remestemcel-L-rknd was associated with fewer all-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (27/30) available for comparison, including the majority reaching statistical significance.


2015 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuo Muroi ◽  
Koichi Miyamura ◽  
Masaya Okada ◽  
Takuya Yamashita ◽  
Makoto Murata ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1274-1274
Author(s):  
Stefan A. Klein ◽  
Thomas Schmitt ◽  
Gesine Bug ◽  
Thomas Luft ◽  
Sabine Mousset ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1274 Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract remains a major complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The outcome of patients who fail first-line therapy with steroids is poor. There is no standard therapy for steroid-refractory aGvHD. A promising strategy is the use of pentostatin, an inhibitor of adenosine deaminase. The capacity of this purine analogue to inhibit proliferation and to induce apoptosis of T-cells in combination with its mild toxicity resulted in the approach to use pentostatin in steroid-refractory aGvHD. Here we report on our experience with pentostatin in steroid-refractory aGvHD at the universities of Frankfurt (F) and Heidelberg (H). Patients: From 2000 to 2009 (F) and from 2005 to 2009 (H) a total number of 72 (F: n=39; H: n=33) consecutive patients who had undergone first-line salvage treatment of histologically proven severe steroid-refractory aGvHD of the GI-tract with pentostatin were retrospectively analyzed. Steroid-refractory aGvHD was defined as progression or no improvement of diarrhea despite a treatment with prednisolone (≥2mg/kg/d) for ≥ 3 days. In steroid-refractory aGvHD pentostatin was infused at a dose of 1mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days. Patients received 1–4 cycles. Response after therapy with pentostatin was classified as complete (CR, no ongoing symptoms of GvHD), very good partial (VGPR, residual symptoms only) or no response (NR). 31 females and 41 males with a median age of 48 (range: 20–68) years were included. The underlying diseases were AML (n=43), ALL (n=10), CML (n=1), lymphoma (n=7), MDS (n=6), and multiple myeloma (n=5). The conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 25 patients and reduced intensity in 47 patients. Patients were transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells (except one bone marrow transplantation) from matched siblings (n=26), matched unrelated (n=27) or mismatched donors (n=19). All patients suffered from severe steroid-refractory intestinal aGvHD overall grade III (n=39) or IV (n=33). Results: 39 patients (54%) responded to pentostatin. 30 patients (42%) achieved CR, 9 patients (12%) VGPR. Clinical improvement occurred within a median of 13 (range: 5–58) days after the first infusion of pentostatin. 33 patients (46%) did not respond. After a median follow up of 27 (range 10 to 108) months 23 patients (32%) are alive. 49 patients (68%) died (53% therapy related, 15% due to relapse of the malignant disease). 59% of the 39 responding patients versus 0% of the non-responders survived. 10 patients without response to pentostatin received further salvage therapies including alemtuzumab, infliximab, rituximab, tacrolimus, etanercept or mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). All these patients died without response. 26 patients (36%) achieved CR or VGPR after one cycle of pentostatin. 24 patients without CR or VGPR after one cycle were treated with 1–3 further cycles. The probability of survival was significantly higher for patients who responded after one cycle in comparison with patients without response and further pentostatin treatment (73% versus 13%, p<0.01). Thus, further immunosuppressive therapy beyond one cycle of pentostatin has almost no positive impact on survival. Except one patient who died 4 years after pentostatin due to relapse of lymphoma all one-year-survivors stayed alive. Conclusions: In the critical clinical situation of severe steroid-refractory intestinal aGvHD pentostatin conferred encouraging rates of response and overall survival. In comparison with other treatment options such as MSC or immunosuppressive monoclonal antibodies pentostatin has some favorable characteristics: Its effect is sustainable; the majority of responding patients survived. Costs for pentostatin are relatively low and toxicity is moderate. However, despite therapy with pentostatin mortality in steroid-refractory aGvHD is still unacceptably high. Since response rates and survival after other therapies are even less convincing we suggest using pentostatin as salvage therapy in severe steroid-refractory intestinal aGvHD. Disclosures: Klein: Hospira: Honoraria.


2013 ◽  
Vol 163 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne M. Ball ◽  
Maria E. Bernardo ◽  
Helene Roelofs ◽  
Maarten J. D. van Tol ◽  
Benedetta Contoli ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. S372
Author(s):  
N. Alam ◽  
A. Viswabandya ◽  
J. How ◽  
V. Gupta ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. S259
Author(s):  
Prakash Satwani ◽  
Karen Segal ◽  
Elizabeth Burke ◽  
Joanne Kurtzberg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document