scholarly journals Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): Cross-national comparisons on barriers and resources for optimal care-healthcare professional perspective

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 789-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. I. G. Holt ◽  
A. Nicolucci ◽  
K. Kovacs Burns ◽  
M. Escalante ◽  
A. Forbes ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuriye Kupeli ◽  
Elizabeth L. Sampson ◽  
Gerard Leavey ◽  
Jane Harrington ◽  
Sarah Davis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Keeping people living with advanced dementia in their usual place of residence is becoming a key governmental goal but to achieve this, family carers and health care professionals must negotiate how to provide optimal care. Previously, we reported a realist analysis of the health care professional perspective. Here, we report on family carer perspectives. We aimed to understand the similarities and differences between the two perspectives, gain insights into how the interdependent roles of family carers and HCPs can be optimised, and make recommendations for policy and practice. Method Qualitative study using a realist approach in which we used the criteria from guidance on optimal palliative care in advanced dementia to examine key contexts, mechanisms and outcomes highlighted by family carers. Results The themes and views of family caregivers resonate with those of health care professionals. Their overlapping anxieties related to business-driven care homes, uncertainty of families when making EOL decisions and the importance of symptom management referring to contexts, mechanisms and outcomes, respectively. Contexts specific to family carers were ad hoc information about services, dementia progression and access to funding. Not all family carers identified dementia as terminal, but many recognised the importance of continuity of care and knowing the wishes of the person with dementia. New mechanisms included specific resources for improving EOL care and barriers to discussing and planning for future care. Family carers identified the importance of comfort, being present, the meeting of basic care needs and feeling the right decisions have been made as good outcomes of care. Conclusions Family carers and health care professionals share similar concerns about the challenges to good EOL dementia care. Better understanding of the effects of dementia at the advanced stages would improve confidence in EOL care and reduce uncertainty in decision making for family carers and health care professionals.


Author(s):  
Stacey Hewitt ◽  
Lindsay Apps ◽  
Nicky Hudson ◽  
Murphy Anna ◽  
Peter Bradding ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S579-S581
Author(s):  
K Watanabe ◽  
S Gardiner ◽  
S Arai

Abstract Background The Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Narrative is a global initiative examining perspectives on multiple aspects of UC via 2 related surveys (1 patient [pt]-based and 1 healthcare professional [HCP]-based), with the aim of improving understanding of the impact of UC and identifying gaps in optimal care. We present survey responses from pts and HCPs in Japan, a subanalysis of the global UC Narrative. Methods Surveys were conducted by The Harris Poll between Nov 2017 and Jan 2018. Pts (≥18 years of age) met the following criteria: had a diagnosis of UC (confirmed by endoscopy), had not had a colectomy, had taken prescription UC medication beyond 5-aminosalicylates, and had visited a gastroenterologist/internist in the previous year. HCPs were required to see ≥5 pts with UC per month, and ≥10% of their current pts had to be taking a biologic for their UC. Self-reported treatment history was used as a proxy for disease severity, and >80% of pt respondents were required to have moderate to severe UC. Results 210 pts and 151 HCPs in Japan responded. The mean age of pts with UC was 44.3 (standard deviation 11.6; median 44) years, and 73% were male. Most (85%) pts were satisfied with their communication with their HCP. HCPs slightly underestimated pt satisfaction, believing that, on average, 71% of their pts were satisfied. However, most pts (65%) and HCPs (82%) wished for more discussion about goals for managing or treating UC. Most (83%) pts said they were honest with their HCP when discussing their experiences with UC, although almost half (45%) said they regretted not telling their HCP more; most (75%) HCPs felt that their pts were being honest with them. Over half (55%) of pts said they were hesitant to tell their HCP if they did not take their medication exactly as prescribed; however, most (79%) HCPs believed that >50% of their pts adhered to treatment. HCPs underestimated the importance of toileting accidents to pts (28% vs 54%), and overestimated the importance of mucosal healing (59% vs 29%) (Figure 1). Some pts had misconceptions about treatment: only 69% knew that it was not OK to stop taking UC medications once they felt better, only 76% knew that it was not OK to keep using steroids as a long-term maintenance medication, and only 60% knew that it was possible for their body to stop responding to biologics (Figure 2). Most (71%) HCPs believed that pt advocacy organisations are important, but only recommended them to 26% of pts; only 38% of pts had interacted with one. Conclusion There was a high level of concordance in responses between pts in Japan and their HCPs; however, this survey revealed several gaps between pt and HCP perspectives. Consequently, the importance of pt-HCP communication in treat-to-target strategies remains.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1057-1066
Author(s):  
Felicity Hasson ◽  
Deborah Muldrew ◽  
Emma Carduff ◽  
Anne Finucane ◽  
Lisa Graham-Wisener ◽  
...  

Background: Constipation is a major problem for many older adults, more so for those who are receiving specialist palliative care. However, limited research reports the subjective experiences of constipation, despite evidenced differences between the healthcare professional and patient/carer perspective. Aim: The main aim of this study is to explore the experience of how constipation is assessed and managed within specialist palliative care from the patient, carer and healthcare professional perspective. Design: Exploratory, qualitative design, utilising focus groups and interviews, and analysed using thematic analysis. Setting/participants: Six focus groups with 27 healthcare professionals and semi-structured interviews with 13 patients and 5 family caregivers in specialist palliative care units across three regions of the United Kingdom. Results: Constipation impacted physically, psychologically and socially on patients and families; however, they felt staff relegated it on the list of importance. Lifestyle modifications implemented at home were not incorporated into their specialist palliative care plan within the hospice. Comparatively, healthcare professionals saw constipation solely as a physical symptom. Assessment focused on the physical elements of constipation, and management was pharmacologically driven. Healthcare professionals reported patient embarrassment as a barrier to communicating about bowel care, whereas patients wanted staff to initiate communication and discuss constipation openly. Conclusion: Assessment and management of constipation may not yet reflect the holistic palliative care model. A focus on the pharmacological management may result in lifestyle modifications being underutilised. Healthcare professionals also need to be open to initiate communication on bowel care and consider non-pharmacological approaches. It is important that patients and families are supported in self-care management, alongside standardised guidelines for practice and for healthcare professionals to facilitate this.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document