Nowhere to hide: The importance of instream cover for stream‐living Coastal Cutthroat Trout during seasonal low flow

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke E. Penaluna ◽  
Jason B. Dunham ◽  
Heidi V. Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Coastal Cutthroat Trout

scholarly journals Evaluating Coexistence of Fish Species with Coastal Cutthroat Trout in Low Order Streams of Western Oregon and Washington, USA

Fishes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Kyle D. Martens ◽  
Jason Dunham
Keyword(s):  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Species Interactions ◽  
Coho Salmon ◽  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Single Species ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Small Streams ◽  
Coastal Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Multiple Species ◽  
Low Order

When multiple species of fish coexist there are a host of potential ways through which they may interact, yet there is often a strong focus on studies of single species without considering these interactions. For example, many studies of forestry–stream interactions in the Pacific Northwest have focused solely on the most prevalent species: Coastal cutthroat trout. To examine the potential for interactions of other fishes with coastal cutthroat trout, we conducted an analysis of 281 sites in low order streams located on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula and along the central Oregon coast. Coastal cutthroat trout and juvenile coho salmon were the most commonly found salmonid species within these streams and exhibited positive associations with each other for both presence and density. Steelhead were negatively associated with the presence of coastal cutthroat trout as well as with coho salmon and sculpins (Cottidae). Coastal cutthroat trout most frequently shared streams with juvenile coho salmon. For densities of these co-occurring species, associations between these two species were relatively weak compared to the strong influences of physical stream conditions (size and gradient), suggesting that physical conditions may have more of an influence on density than species interactions. Collectively, our analysis, along with a review of findings from prior field and laboratory studies, suggests that the net effect of interactions between coastal cutthroat trout and coho salmon do not appear to inhibit their presence or densities in small streams along the Pacific Northwest.

Movements of potamodromous coastal cutthroat trout, Salmo clarki clarki, inferred from tagging and scale analyses

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Moring ◽  
Ronald L. Youker ◽  
Robert M. Hooton
Keyword(s):  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Coastal Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Salmo Clarki

Some Morphological Differences Between the Subspecies of Cutthroat Trout, Salmo clarkii clarkii and Salmo clarkii lewisi, in British Columbia

1959 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 903-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. U. Qadri
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Lateral Line ◽  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Complete Separation ◽  
The Body ◽  
Natural Distribution ◽  
Spot Number ◽  
Coastal Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Morphological Differences ◽  
Coastal British Columbia

Coastal cutthroat trout, S. c. clarkii Richardson, occupy most lakes and streams of coastal British Columbia, including the adjacent islands. Yellowstone cutthroat, S. c. lewisi (Girard), occupy southeastern British Columbia; their range is separated from that of the coastal subspecies by a zone lacking cutthroat trout. A map showing all natural distribution records in the province is presented. From 60 to 146 specimens were examined for distinguishing characters. Spots below the lateral line are more numerous towards the anterior end in S. c. clarkii, but more numerous towards the posterior end in S. c. lewisi. A plot of spot number in selected areas of the body provides almost complete separation of individuals of the two subspecies. Significant differences also occur in certain scale counts and in body and peduncle depth, although these characters overlap considerably between the subspecies. No difference was found in vertebral count.

A Synthesis of Juvenile Coastal Cutthroat Trout Emigration Studies: Considerations for Researchers and Resource Managers

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1522-1537
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Burns ◽  
Ronald A. Ptolemy ◽  
Peter J. Tschaplinski
Keyword(s):  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Resource Managers ◽  
Coastal Cutthroat Trout

Cutthroat Trout: Evolutionary Biology and Taxonomy

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Brunelli
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Biology ◽  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Paternal Inheritance ◽  
Westslope Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Chromosome Marker ◽  
Mitochondrial Markers ◽  
Coastal Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Lahontan Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout

<em>Abstract</em>.—A Y chromosome marker shared with Rainbow Trout <em>Oncorhynchus mykiss </em>has been sequenced in many Cutthroat Trout <em>O. clarkii </em>subspecies. The marker is found in and inherited through males. It evolves more slowly than the maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA. The marker delineates the four major groups of Cutthroat Trout: the Lahontan Cutthroat Trout <em>O. c. henshawi </em>subspecies complex, the Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout <em>O. c. bouvieri</em> subspecies complex, Westslope Cutthroat Trout <em>O. c. lewisi</em>, and Coastal Cutthroat Trout <em>O. c. clarkii</em>. The paternal inheritance pattern of the Y marker makes it useful for dissecting the origins of fish with mixed ancestries. We describe a case study using both Y and mitochondrial markers in Lahontan Cutthroat Trout subspecies complex trout populations. Our results confirmed Lahontan Cutthroat Trout affinities for the Paiute Cutthroat Trout <em>O. c. seleniris</em> and Willow–Whitehorse Creek Cutthroat Trout. However, we found evidence of a complex ancestry for Guano Creek, Oregon trout, a group that has been proposed by some to be related to the Alvord Cutthroat Trout, a subspecies thought to be extinct.

Cutthroat Trout: Evolutionary Biology and Taxonomy

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Biology ◽  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Westslope Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Oncorhynchus Clarkii ◽  
Coastal Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Lahontan Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Museum Samples ◽  
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout ◽  
The 1960S

<em>Abstract</em>.—There has been considerable interest in the systematics and classification of Cutthroat Trout since the 1800s. Cutthroat Trout native to western North America (currently classified as <em>Oncorhynchus clarkii</em>) have historically been grouped or separated using many different classification schemes. Since the 1960s, Robert Behnke has been a leader in these efforts. Introductions of nonnative trout (other forms of Cutthroat Trout, and Rainbow Trout <em>O. mykiss</em>) have obscured some historical patterns of distribution and differentiation. Morphological and meristic analyses have often grouped the various forms of Cutthroat Trout together based on the shared presence of the “cutthroat mark,” high scale counts along the lateral line, and the presence of basibranchial teeth. Spotting patterns and counts of gill rakers and pyloric caeca have in some cases been helpful in differentiation of groups (e.g., Coastal Cutthroat Trout <em>O. c. clarkii</em>, Lahontan Cutthroat Trout <em>O. c. henshawi</em>, and Westslope Cutthroat Trout <em>O. c. lewisi</em>) currently classified as subspecies. The historical genetic methods of allozyme genotyping through protein electrophoresis and chromosome analyses were often helpful in differentiating the various subspecies of Cutthroat Trout. Allozyme genotyping allowed four major groups to be readily recognized (Coastal Cutthroat Trout, Westslope Cutthroat Trout, the Lahontan Cutthroat Trout subspecies complex, and Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout <em>O. c. bouvieri </em>subspecies complex) while chromosome analyses showed similarity between the Lahontan and Yellowstone Cutthroat trout subspecies complex trout (possibly reflecting shared ancestral type) and differentiated the Coastal and Westslope Cutthroat trouts from each other and those two groups. DNA results may yield higher resolution of evolutionary relationships of Cutthroat Trout and allow incorporation of ancient museum samples. Accurate resolution of taxonomic differences among various Cutthroat Trout lineages, and hybridization assessments, requires several approaches and will aid in conservation of these charismatic and increasingly rare native fishes.

Anadromous Coastal Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) as a Host for Argulus pugettensis (Crustacea, Branchiura): Parasite Prevalence, Intensity and Distribution

2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Losee ◽  
Simon R. M. Jones ◽  
Caitlin A. E. McKinstry ◽  
William N. Batts ◽  
Paul K. Hershberger
Keyword(s):  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Parasite Prevalence ◽  
Oncorhynchus Clarkii ◽  
Coastal Cutthroat Trout

scholarly journals Evaluation of Visible Implant Elastomer Tags in Wild Coastal Cutthroat Trout in the Marine Environment

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1443-1450
Author(s):  
James P. Losee ◽  
Hannah S. Faulkner ◽  
Todd R. Seamons
Keyword(s):  
Marine Environment ◽  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Coastal Cutthroat Trout

Evaluation of an in situ early life stage test with cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarki, for environmental monitoring – a case study using mine effluent

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Chalmers ◽  
J. Elphick ◽  
G. Gilron ◽  
H. Bailey
Keyword(s):  
Early Life ◽  
Life Stage ◽  
Cutthroat Trout ◽  
Early Life Stage ◽  
Exposure Period ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Treated Effluent ◽  
Mine Effluent ◽  
A Site

This study evaluated an in situ early life stage test using cutthroat trout for potential use in Canada's Metal Mines Effluent Regulations' Environmental Effects Monitoring (EEM) program. Current field monitoring approaches focus on either adult fish surveys or mesocosm studies, but both of these have inherent limitations that may affect their suitability on a site-specific basis. This study evaluated an alternative approach, namely an in situ toxicity test, as part of an EEM program for a zinc, copper and gold mine. Hatchboxes containing cutthroat trout embryos were placed in a creek that receives treated effluent from the mine, and monitored through the swim-up stage to evaluate hatching success, survival, normal development and growth. Advantages of the method include: no feeding requirement during exposure, fixed exposure locations, relevant endpoints and high statistical sensitivity. In addition, the extended exposure period integrated long-term exposure variables, including low-flow and freshet events. This approach also has application to other salmonid species and types of discharges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document